Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 11 3004-3018, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen

T. A. McAllister, H. D. Bae, G. A. Jones and K. J. Cheng
Agriculture Canada, Research Station, Lethbridge, Alberta.

Direct microscopic examination of the rumen and its contents shows microbial populations largely attached to feed particles in the digesta. Most feeds contain a surface layer that is resistant to attachment and therefore to digestion. Infiltration of these recalcitrant epidermal layers through damage sites or through focused enzymatic attack is essential for initiation of the digestive process. Proliferation of primary colonizing cells produces glycocalyx-enclosed microcolonies. Secondary colonizers from the ruminal fluid associate with microcolonies, resulting in the formation of multispecies microbial biofilms. These metabolically related organisms associate with their preferred substrates and produce the myriad of enzymes necessary for the digestion of chemically and structurally complex plant tissues. Upon accessing the internal, enzyme-susceptible tissues, microbial "digestive consortia" attach to a variety of nutrients, including protein, cellulose, and starch and digest insoluble feed materials from the inside out. Substances that prevent microbial attachment or promote detachment (e.g., condensed tannins, methylcellulose) can completely inhibit cellulose digestion. As the microbial consortium matures and adapts to a particular type of feed, it becomes inherently stable and its participant microorganisms are notoriously difficult to manipulate due to the impenetrable nature of biofilms. Properties of feed that place constraints on microbial attachment and biofilm formation can have a profound effect on both the rate and extent of feed digestion in the rumen. Developments in feed processing (i.e., chemical and physical), plant breeding, and genetic engineering (both of ruminal microorganisms and plants) that overcome these constraints through the promotion of microbial attachment and biofilm formation could substantially benefit ruminant production.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. H. Kingston-Smith, T. E. Davies, J. E. Edwards, and M. K. Theodorou From plants to animals; the role of plant cell death in ruminant herbivores J. Exp. Bot., February 4, 2008; (2008) erm326v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. R. Fraser, A. V. Chaves, Y. Wang, T. A. McAllister, K. A. Beauchemin, and C. Benchaar Assessment of the Effects of Cinnamon Leaf Oil on Rumen Microbial Fermentation Using Two Continuous Culture Systems J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2315 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Gorocica-Buenfil and S. C. Loerch Effect of cattle age, forage level, and corn processing on diet digestibility and feedlot performance J Anim Sci, March 1, 2005; 83(3): 705 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, D. Greer, and T. A. McAllister Effects of moisture, roller setting, and saponin-based surfactant on barley processing, ruminal degradation of barley, and growth performance by feedlot steers J Anim Sci, September 1, 2003; 81(9): 2145 - 2154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Koike, J. Pan, Y. Kobayashi, and K. Tanaka Kinetics of In Sacco Fiber-Attachment of Representative Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria Monitored by Competitive PCR J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1429 - 1435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Kononoff, H. A. Lehman, and A. J. Heinrichs Technical Note--A Comparison of Methods Used to Measure Eating and Ruminating Activity in Confined Dairy Cattle J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2002; 85(7): 1801 - 1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]