J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Enciso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Poivey, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Perez-Enciso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Poivey, J. P.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 11 2775-2786, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic implications of a bivariate threshold model for litter size components

M. Perez-Enciso, J. L. Foulley, L. Bodin and J. P. Poivey
Station de Genetique Quantitative et Appliquee, INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

A bivariate threshold model for ovulation rate and embryonic survival was developed and the genetic relationships in the observed scale among ovulation rate, embryonic survival, and litter size were derived. This model was applied to data of nulliparous Lacaune sheep. Heritabilities assumed were .30, .05, and .12 for ovulation rate, embryonic survival, and litter size, respectively. Three values for genetic correlation between ovulation rate and embryonic survival were considered: -.78, -.30, and 0. Three criteria to increase litter size were studied: a linear index combining ovulation rate and embryonic survival, ovulation rate, and litter size. The linear index used gave an increasing weight to embryonic survival with higher ovulation rates. A selection scheme was simulated to test predications of response for the different criteria. A nucleus of 10 sires and 300 dams was simulated. Females were selected according to their own performance (mean of three records) and males according to their dam's performance. Selection was continued for six discrete generations. Response with an index was better than direct selection only in the short term, whereas this superiority was not maintained in the last generations of selection. Indirect selection on ovulation rate was clearly inferior to both index and direct selection. In the situation analyzed here, litter size seems to be close to the optimum 'natural index' combining ovulation rate and embryonic survival.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.