J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ringuet, H.
Right arrow Articles by Petitclerc, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ringuet, H.
Right arrow Articles by Petitclerc, D.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 10 2709-2717, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Long-term effects of human growth hormone-releasing hormone and photoperiod on hormone release and puberty in dairy heifers

H. Ringuet, G. Pelletier, P. Brazeau, P. Gaudreau, L. A. Guilbault, J. Morisset, Y. Couture and D. Petitclerc
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Lennoxville, Quebec, Canada.

Forty-eight Holstein dairy heifers (98.9 kg BW; 3 mo old) were subjected for 246 d to twice-daily s.c. injections of saline (CTL) or human growth hormone-releasing hormone (GRH; 5 micrograms/kg BW) and to photoperiods of 8 h of light (L): 16 h of dark (D) or 16L:8D according to a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Jugular blood samples were collected from 16 heifers at 3, 4, 8, and 11 mo of age to monitor prolactin, growth hormone, and estradiol-17 beta. Plasma progesterone concentrations were monitored weekly in all heifers as an index of puberty (> 1 ng/mL). Growth hormone release was induced by GRH (P < .001) throughout the trial; area under the GH curve (AUC) averaged 1,582 vs 3,643 ng.min-1.mL-1 in CTL vs GRH heifers. However, GRH-induced GH response was less (P < .05) after the second daily injection. There was also an interaction (P = .08) between GRH, photoperiod, and days of treatment on GRH-induced GH response; AUC was greater in GRH-16L:8D than in GRH-8L:16D heifers at 3 mo but less at 8 mo of age. The PRL concentrations were similar for both photoperiods at 3 mo (36.4 vs 41.7 ng/mL) and 8 mo (16.2 vs 12.8 ng/mL) of age but were greater in 16L:8D vs 8L:16D heifers at 4 mo (18.4 vs 39.3 ng/mL) and 11 mo (26.3 vs 44.1 ng/mL) of age (photoperiod x day interaction, P < .001). Photoperiod of 16L:8D vs 8L:16D reduced (P < .01) weight at puberty in CTL heifers (251 vs 303 kg BW) and to a lesser extent in GRH-treated heifers (271 vs 284 kg BW; GRH x photoperiod interaction, P = .10). In conclusion, GH response is maintained throughout 8 mo of GRH treatment, and a 16L:8D photoperiod will reduce age and weight at puberty in heifers. Furthermore, refractoriness to photoperiod-induced PRL changes was detected.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ReproductionHome page
M Mondal and B S Prakash
Effects of long-term GH-releasing factor administration on patterns of GH and LH secretion in growing female buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis)
Reproduction, January 1, 2004; 127(1): 45 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.