J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ravindran, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kornegay, E. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ravindran, V.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 10 2670-2680, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of diet acidity and protein level or source of calcium on the performance, gastrointestinal content measurements, bone measurements, and carcass composition of gilt and barrow weanling pigs

E. T. Kornegay, J. L. Evans and V. Ravindran
Department of Animal Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061-0306.

A total of 228 crossbred weanling pigs (average age of 25 d and BW of 6.44 kg) were used in two trials to evaluate the responses to sex, diet acidity, protein level, and source of calcium on the performance, gastrointestinal digesta measurements, bone measurements, and carcass composition. Diet acidity was manipulated by varying the sources of supplemental phosphorus in the diets. Trial 1 (5 wk) was conducted as a 2 x 3 x 2 factorial to evaluate sex (gilts and barrows), diet acidity (pH 5.9 and .90% P, pH 6.1 and .63% P, and pH 6.9 and .63% P), and level of protein (16 and 22% CP). In Trial 2 (6 wk), diet acidity (pH 5.5, 5.9, and 6.8, all with .7% P) and Ca sources (CaCO3 and CaSO4) were used with gilts and barrows. The sex x diet acidity interactions were significant for ADG in both trials. Barrows seemed to respond to both the more acidic diets and the buffered phosphate diets even though the pH was less acidic than that of the unbuffered diets. Gilts responded only to the more acidic diets. In Trial 1, gilts ate more and grew faster (P < .05) than barrows, but no sex effects on performance were observed in Trial 2. Pigs fed 22% CP diets grew faster (P < .001) and more efficiently (P < .001) than did pigs fed 16% CP diets, but protein level x diet acidity and protein level x sex interactions were not significant. Stomach digesta DM, pH, and titration value were not consistently influenced by sex and diet acidity in Trials 1 and 2, by protein level in Trial 1, and by calcium source in Trial 2. Only the sex x diet acidity interaction for stomach DM tended to be significant in both trials; gilts fed the less acidic diets had the lowest DM, whereas barrows fed the more acidic diets had the lowest DM values. Although not significant in every case in both trials, bone (average of metacarpal and metatarsal) volume was lower and specific gravity and shear stress values were higher for gilts than for barrows. Pigs fed 16% CP diets had higher specific gravity (P < .05) and stress (P < .06) values than pigs fed 22% CP diets. A protein level x diet acidity interaction (P < .03) for stress suggested that pigs fed 22% CP diets were unaffected by diet acidity, whereas pigs fed 16% CP had the highest stress values when fed the more acidic diet and the lower P level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
G. M. Hill, S. K. Baido, G. L. Cromwell, D. C. Mahan, J. L. Nelssen, H. H. Stein, and NCCC-42 Committee on Swine Nutrition
Evaluation of sex and lysine during the nursery period
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.