J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bray, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, B.
Right arrow Articles by Bray, D. E.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 72, Issue 1 117-125, Copyright © 1994 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Measuring intramuscular fat in beef with ultrasonic frequency analysis

B. Park, A. D. Whittaker, R. K. Miller and D. E. Bray
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2117.

Frequency analysis of Fourier spectra from ultrasonic signals was used for predicting intramuscular fat content of beef tissue. The most significant parameter in the frequency domain for predicting intramuscular fat concentration in beef was the number of local maxima. It represents the discontinuity of the Fourier spectrum caused by inhomogeneous fat concentrations in the longissimus muscle, which had the correlation coefficient .89 (P < .05) when a 2.25-MHz shear probe was used. The optimum frequency for predicting the amount of intramuscular fat content in the longissimus muscle was found to be 1.92 MHz. A multivariate regression model was developed using parameters in the frequency domain as follows: percentage of fat concentration = 1.790 - 2.373x (lower frequency) + .049x (bandwidth) + 1.178x (local maxima) (R2 = .82). Validation demonstrated that the multivariate model in the frequency domain was capable of predicting intramuscular fat concentration with an average of 1.17 percentage of fat error (P < .05). The multivariate model was most appropriate for predicting intramuscular fat below 4%. The mean accuracy of the model in the frequency domain was approximately 79%.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society of Animal Science.