J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunshea, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunshea, F. R.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 7 1966-1977, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of metabolism modifiers on lipid metabolism in the pig

F. R. Dunshea
Department of Agriculture, Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Werribee, Australia.

Porcine somatotropin (pST) and certain beta-adrenergic agonists are potent metabolic modifiers that can improve performance in pigs. Pigs treated with either compounds utilize feed more efficiently and are leaner than controls. Comparative slaughter data clearly demonstrate that pST and some beta-agonists stimulate protein deposition. Porcine somatotropin decreases lipid deposition, but this is not the case for all beta-agonists. Somatotropin decreases lipid deposition through decreasing adipose tissue sensitivity to insulin, inhibiting lipogenesis, and perhaps stimulating lipolysis. Although lipolysis is increased during pST treatment of growing pigs, the greatest consequence is decreased lipogenesis. Although under controlled conditions certain beta-agonists stimulate lipolysis and inhibit lipogenesis, the limited metabolic studies suggest that at doses that are most efficacious for enhanced protein deposition, there are limited effects on lipid metabolism. In part, this may be due to desensitization of adipose tissue beta-adrenergic receptors and possibly a consequence of antagonism of beta-receptors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. A. Nafikov and D. C. Beitz
Carbohydrate and Lipid Metabolism in Farm Animals
J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 702 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Novakofski
Adipogenesis: Usefulness of in vitro and in vivo experimental models
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. E. Mills, M. E. Spurlock, and D. J. Smith
{beta}-Adrenergic receptor subtypes that mediate ractopaminestimulation of lipolysis
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 662 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. N. Sillence, K. J. Munn, and R. G. Campbell
Manipulation of growth in pigs through treatment of the neonate with clenbuterol and somatotropin
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1852 - 1862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.