Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 7 1737-1741, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic and environmental parameters for mature weight and other growth measures in Polled Hereford cattle

K. D. Bullock, J. K. Bertrand and L. L. Benyshek
Department of Animal Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

Variances and covariances were estimated for birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WW), yearling gain (YG), yearling weight (YW), yearling height (YH), relative growth from birth to weaning (RGW) and weaning to yearling (RGY), and mature weight (MW). Field records on 572,446 Polled Hereford cattle were analyzed. Because multiple dam weights were collected on a cow the MW used in the analysis was calculated using a nonlinear regression correction factor computed by fitting a quadratic with a plateau to the data. If the cow had an observation(s) beyond the inflection point (IP), the closest weight to that point was used. If the cow only had observation(s) before the IP the closest weight to that point was nonlinearly adjusted to the plateau. The IP for this data set was 1,506 d and the plateau was 554.7 kg. Heritabilities and genetic and environmental correlations were calculated from the appropriate (co)variances and phenotypic correlations were computed. Heritability estimates for BWT, WW, YG, YW, YH, RGW, RGY, and MW were .49, .24, .23, .30, .59, .24, .15, and .52, respectively. Genetic correlations between MW with BWT, WW, YG, YW, YH, RGW, and RGY were .64, .80, .76, .89, .73, -.29, and .35, respectively, environmental correlations were .15, .43, .05, .40, 1.03, .32, and -.10, respectively, and phenotypic correlations were .33, .32, .28, .46, .70, .00, and .07, respectively.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Williams, D. J. Garrick, and S. E. Speidel Reducing bias in maintenance energy expected progeny difference by accounting for selection on weaning and yearling weights J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1628 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Forni, M. Piles, A. Blasco, L. Varona, H. N. Oliveira, R. B. Lobo, and L. G. Albuquerque Comparison of different nonlinear functions to describe Nelore cattle growth J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 496 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Enns and G. B. Nicoll Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3348 - 3357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Jaffrezic, E. Venot, D. Laloe, A. Vinet, and G. Renand Use of structured antedependence models for the genetic analysis of growth curves J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3465 - 3473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck Genetic parameters for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score in beef cows J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3112 - 3122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. H. Choy, J. S. Brinks, and R. M. Bourdon Repeated-measure animal models to estimate genetic components of mature weight, hip height, and body condition score J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2071 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]