J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Unruh, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kreikemeier, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Unruh, J. A.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 7 1699-1703, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Carcass traits and the occurrence of dark cutters in pregnant and nonpregnant feedlot heifers

K. K. Kreikemeier and J. A. Unruh
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the occurrence of dark cutters and selected carcass traits differ between pregnant and nonpregnant feedlot heifers. Feedlot heifers (n = 8,292) were identified at slaughter as being either nonpregnant, pregnant with a moderate-sized fetus (midgestation), or pregnant with a large fetus (late gestation). This was based on visual appraisal of a gravid uterus at the evisceration table. After chilling (24 to 72 h), carcass data were collected. Cattle originated from 23 different commercial feedyards located within a 350-km radius of a commercial slaughter facility located in southwest Kansas. Across slaughter lots, the incidence of pregnancy varied from 0 to 25% with an overall mean of 4.74%. Carcass traits of heifers with moderate or large fetuses did not differ (P > .15). Compared with carcasses from nonpregnant heifers, carcasses from pregnant heifers were 4.5 kg lighter (P < .01), had .11 cm more fat thickness (P < .01), and exceeded the number of carcasses that graded Choice or Prime by 6% (P < .01). Carcasses from pregnant heifers had higher maturity scores (P < .01) and there was no incidence of dark cutters (P < .01) compared with a 1.7% incidence of dark cutters in carcasses from nonpregnant heifers. Any economical advantage in the pregnant heifers due to their higher percentage of Choice carcasses and lower incidence of dark cutters may be offset by their increased carcass fat thickness and lower dressing percentage.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, J. M. Wallace, and T. E. Spencer
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Intrauterine growth retardation: Implications for the animal sciences
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2316 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.