J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Makarechian, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Makarechian, M.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 5 1123-1127, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Factors influencing growth performance of beef bulls in a test station

M. F. Liu and M. Makarechian
Department of Animal Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Performance records of 2,034 beef bulls tested at the Ellerslie Test Station, Alberta, Canada from 1974 to 1987 were analyzed to identify important factors that affect growth of bulls in a test station and to estimate the contribution of herd of origin to phenotypic variances of growth traits. Compared with herd of origin, age of dam, start of test age, and weight of bull were not of practical importance. Herd of origin accounted for a large fraction of phenotypic variance of weight, decreasing from 52 to 35% and from 37 to 30% from start to end of test in groups of small and large breeds, respectively. The effect of herd of origin on periodic and cumulative ADG decreased as the test advanced. The least affected periods were either 28 to 112 d or 56 to 112 d of test. However, the effect increased during the 112- to 140-d period. The effect of herd of origin on periodic relative growth rate was large and relatively stable up to 84 d, decreased during the 84- to 112-d period, and increased during the 112- to 140-d period. The effect of herd of origin on cumulative relative growth rate showed an increasing trend. Because ADG was highly influenced by herd of origin during the first 4 wk of test and least affected during the 28- to 112-d period or the 56- to 112-d period, a 56-d adjustment period followed by an 84-d test period for accurate evaluation of beef bulls for growth potential seems appropriate.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
Z. Wang, J. D. Nkrumah, C. Li, J. A. Basarab, L. A. Goonewardene, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore
Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2289 - 2298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
G. D. Snowder and L. D. Van Vleck
Effect of duration of performance test on variance component estimates for lamb growth rate
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2078 - 2084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. F. Baker, R. C. Vann, and W. E. Neville Jr.
Evaluations of genotypexenvironment interactions of beef bulls performance-tested in feedlot or pasture
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1716 - 1724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.