J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leymaster, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leymaster, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jenkins, T. G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 4 859-869, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Comparison of Texel- and Suffolk-sired crossbred lambs for survival, growth, and compositional traits

K. A. Leymaster and T. G. Jenkins
Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166.

Texel sheep were imported from Finland and Denmark for evaluation as a terminal sire population relative to the Suffolk breed. The objective was to estimate effects of sire breed on fitness, growth, and compositional traits of crossbred progeny that were serially slaughtered at 63, 105, 147, and 189 d of age. A total of 325 lambs, sired by 19 Texel and 20 Suffolk rams, were born to mature, half-Finnsheep ewes during a 2-yr period. Carcass traits were recorded on 183 lambs. Texel-sired lambs had greater survival to weaning (P = .06) and similar birth and weaning weights compared with Suffolk progeny. Lambs by Texel sires grew 11% less rapidly from 63 to 189 d of age. Estimated accretion rates of carcass fat at 189 d of age were 96.1 and 78.5 g/d for Suffolk and Texel progeny, respectively. Corresponding values for carcass protein were 17.4 and 16.0 g/d. At fixed ages, area of the longissimus muscle did not differ between sire breeds. Texel progeny weighed less at 189 d of age, producing lighter, leaner carcasses of shorter length (P < .05). Compositional differences were not detected when sire breeds were compared at 25 kg of carcass weight. However, Texel progeny had significantly greater depth of fat at the 12th rib and weight of kidney-pelvic fat. Data indicated that Texel-sired lambs deposited proportionally more subcutaneous and less intermuscular fat than did lambs by Suffolk sires. Due to the apparent advantage in lamb survival and the observation that Texel progeny produce lean carcasses relative to the intermediate growth rate and mature size characteristic of the breed, it is concluded that Texel sheep can be used effectively as a terminal sire breed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Freking and K. A. Leymaster
Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: IV. Survival, growth, and carcass traits of F1 lambs
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3144 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. Casas, B. A. Freking, and K. A. Leymaster
Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, and Montadale breeds of sheep: II. Reproduction of F1 ewes in fall mating seasons
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1280 - 1289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.