J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayourthe, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vernay, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayourthe, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vernay, M.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 4 1026-1031, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of protein-protected fat on ruminal and total nutrient digestibility of sheep diets

C. Bayourthe, R. Moncoulon and M. Vernay
Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique, Laboratoire d'Ingenierie Agronomique, Toulouse, France.

Experiments were conducted to determine the effects of supplementing chopped ryegrass hay with 0, 5, 10, or 20% fat coated with ruminal bypass protein (Prolip on ruminal digestion by cows and nutrient digestibility by sheep. Ruminal disappearances of DM, ADF, and NDF were measured by the in sacco technique using a cannulated cow. Degradation of DM, ADF, and NDF was not affected by protected fat supplementation at the 5, 10, or 20% level during the first 16 h in the rumen. In addition, supplementation with Prolip did not influence in vitro fermentation characteristics such as pH and VFA patterns. A digestibility experiment with six mature sheep in a switch-back design showed no decrease in feed intake or other undesired effects between unsupplemented (basal) and Prolip-supplemented diets. Whatever the diet fed to sheep, fiber digestibility was similar; however, DM and nitrogen digestibilities were significantly higher relative to the basal diet when ryegrass hay was substituted at 20% (64.2 vs 59.0% and 74.1 vs 71.1%, respectively). Ether extract digestion was enhanced by increasing level of Prolip; the corresponding values were 48.0, 64.9, 74.6, and 84.6% at 0, 5, 10, or 20% Prolip. Likewise, Prolip supplementation at the 10 or 20% level augmented digestibility of energy (62.7 or 65.9 vs 59.2%). Nitrogen and energy retentions were improved due to the decreases in fecal and(or) urinary excretion(s).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.