J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ball, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aziz, N. N.
Right arrow Articles by Ball, R. O.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 2 400-407, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The effect of live weight gain and live weight loss on body composition of merino wethers: noncarcass organs

N. N. Aziz, D. M. Murray and R. O. Ball
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

The weight of the noncarcass external tissues, thoracic organs, and visceral organs was measured during live weight gain (LWG) and live weight loss (LWL) to evaluate the effect of different periods of normal and retarded growth on noncarcass organs. Thirty-five Merino wethers were allowed ad libitum access to an experimental diet of 80% alfalfa chaff and 20% cereal grain (17.23% CP and 12.09 MJ/kg of DE) to grow from 23.0 to 33.0 kg live weight and then fed to lose 10 kg at 133 g/d. Groups of five animals were slaughtered at live weights of 23.0, 26.3, 29.6, and 33.0 kg during LWG and 29.6, 26.3, and 23.0 kg during LWL. Although total weight of noncarcass organs was significantly lower in LWL animals than in LWG animals at 23.0- and 26.3-kg (P < .05) common slaughter weights, the weight of some noncarcass organs was significantly greater in LWL animals. For example, the weight of the head at 23.0 and 26.3 kg (P < .05), of the feet and esophagus at 23.0 (P < .01) and 26.3 kg (P < .05), and of the total alimentary tract fat at 23.0 kg (P < .01) was greater in LWL wethers. Weights of other organs, however, were lower in LWL animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.