J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, M. E.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 2 334-340, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Divergent selection for postweaning feed conversion in Angus beef cattle: III. Linear body measurements of progeny

N. H. Park, M. D. Bishop and M. E. Davis
Animal Science Department, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Postweaning performance data were obtained on 401 group-fed, purebred Angus calves from 24 selected sires (12 high- and 12 low-feed-conversion sires) from 1983 through 1986 at the Northwestern Branch of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. Body measurements of progeny were taken from 1983 through 1986 for hip height and backfat, whereas others, except chest measurements (depth and width) that were available only in 1985, were taken from 183 progeny born in 1985 and 1986. The objective of this portion of the study was to determine whether differences in linear body measurements exist between progeny of high- and low-feed-conversion sires. Differences between progeny of high- and low-feed-conversion sires tended to exist (P < .10) for heart girth (176.3 +/- 1.2 vs 173.2 +/- 1.2 cm) and were significant for backfat thickness (.94 +/- .01 vs .87 +/- .02 cm). No significant differences were observed for hip height (115.3 +/- .5 vs 115.5 +/- .5 cm), chest depth (58.8 +/- .6 vs 57.4 +/- .6 cm), chest width (44.4 +/- .5 vs 44.0 +/- .5 cm), head width (21.2 +/- .2 vs 21.1 +/- .2 cm), head length (42.4 +/- .3 vs 41.6 +/- .3 cm), muzzle circumference (41.0 +/- .4 vs 41.6 +/- .3 cm), length between hooks and pins (46.7 +/- .5 vs 46.2 +/- .5 cm), length between shoulder and hooks (94.9 +/- 1.0 vs 93.1 +/- 1.0 cm), or volume (361,199 +/- 4,885 vs 352,718 +/- 5,026 cm3).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.