J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C. A., Jr

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 71, Issue 12 3458-3465, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Combined effects of stocking rate and supplemental feeding level on adult beef cows grazing native rangeland in Texas

J. E. Huston, P. V. Thompson and C. A. Taylor Jr
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System, San Angelo 76901.

A grazing study was conducted over 4 yr to determine the effects of stocking rate and supplemental feeding levels on intake, and BW and body condition changes by adult beef cows. Stocking rates were 12.3, 16.5, and 24.7 animal units/(100 ha.yr). Supplemental feed treatments included a negative control (NC) and 300 g/(cow.d) of CP with either 2 (L), 4 (M), or 8 (H) Mcal/(cow.d) of DE from early December to late March. Groups fed supplements (L, M, and H) lost less BW from fall to spring (P < .01) and reciprocally gained less BW from spring to weaning (P < .01) than NC cows. The L cows tended (P = .14) to lose less BW between fall and spring than M and H cows. Treatment effects on condition score were similar to those for BW change. Forage intake, estimated by measurements of fecal output, was greater by supplemented cows (P = .02); L was greater than M and H (P = .004). Increased stocking rate correlated with increased fall-to-spring BW losses (P < .002), spring-to-weaning BW gains (P < .0001), and decreased winter forage intake (P < .005). These data provide quantitative bases for the effects of stocking rate and supplemental feeding on BW and condition dynamics. Low-level feeding of a high-protein supplement can increase intake of dormant range forage, thereby increasing nutrient intake. High-level feeding of low-protein supplements seems to increase nutrient status primarily by providing supplemental nutrients. Increasing stocking rate to the reported extremes decreased forage intake and resulted in unfavorable BW and condition changes.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Society of Animal Science.