Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 9 2758-2765, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Ultrasonic prediction of carcass merit in beef cattle: evaluation of technician effects on ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area

T. L. Perkins, R. D. Green, K. E. Hamlin, H. H. Shepard and M. F. Miller
Department of Animal Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409-2141.

The objective of this study was to determine technician effects of live animal ultrasonic estimates of fat thickness (FTU) and longissimus muscle area (LMAU). Steers (n = 36) representing four breed-types (Brown Swiss, Average Zebu-cross Mexican, Corriente Mexican, and typical British crossbred) of commercial slaughter cattle were isonified to estimate accuracy and repeatability of fat thickness (FT) and longissimus muscle area (LMA) measurements by two experienced technicians. Repeated measures of FTU and LMAU were taken by technicians on two consecutive days with an Aloka 500V ultrasound unit equipped with a 3.5-MHz, 172-mm scanning width, linear-array transducer. Ultrasonic estimates of fat thickness and LMAU were taken at the 12th and 13th rib interface 48 h before slaughter; carcass fat thickness (FTC) and longissimus muscle area (LMAC) were measured 48 h postmortem. Means for FTU, FTC, LMAU, and LMAC were .91 +/- .36 cm, .82 +/- .40 cm, 70.7 +/- 9.43 cm2, and 72.4 +/- 8.9 cm2, respectively. Ultrasound and carcass measures of FT and LMA were different (P less than .01) among breed-types but were not different (P greater than .10) between technicians or for technician x breed-type interactions. Pooled simple correlation coefficients (P less than .01) were .87 and .86 between FTU and FTC and .76 and .82 between LMAU and LMAC for Technicians 1 and 2, respectively. Repeatabilities estimated by intraclass correlation methods were .91 +/- .03 and .81 +/- .06 for images repeated over 2 d and .95 +/- .02 and .83 +/- .05 for images repeated by two technicians for FT and LMA, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Gilman and B. O. Wolf Use of portable ultrasonography as a nondestructive method for estimating reproductive effort in lizards J. Exp. Biol., June 1, 2007; 210(11): 1859 - 1867. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R. Silva, J. J. Afonso, V. A. Santos, A. Monteiro, C. M. Guedes, J. M. T. Azevedo, and A. Dias-da-Silva In vivo estimation of sheep carcass composition using real-time ultrasound with two probes of 5 and 7.5 MHz and image analysis J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3433 - 3439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hassen, D. E. Wilson, G. H. Rouse, and R. G. Tait Jr. Partitioning variances of growth in ultrasound longissimus muscle area measures in Angus bulls and heifers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1272 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 676 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]