J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jungst, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhlers, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Jungst, S. B.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 9 2707-2713, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits to selection for 200-day weight in Duroc swine

D. L. Kuhlers and S. B. Jungst
Animal and Dairy Science Department, Auburn University, AL 36849-5415.

Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits from a line of Duroc pigs selected for increased 200-d weight along with a randomly selected control line were studied in 189 litters (116 select, 73 control) and 191 pigs (106 select, 85 control), respectively. Reproductive and maternal traits studied included litter sizes born, born alive, and alive at 21 d and litter weight at birth and at 21 d. Carcass traits studied were carcass length, longissimus muscle area, average backfat thickness, 10th rib backfat thickness, specific gravity, weights of closely trimmed ham, loin, and shoulder, belly weight, subjective scoring of the longissimus muscle for color and marbling, estimated percentage of muscle and lean gain per day. Total weighted cumulative selection differential for 200-d weight was 81.7 kg. The realized heritability for 200-d weight was .18 +/- .08, and the change in 200-d weight was 2.5 +/- 1.2 kg per generation. The regression coefficient of litter size born on generation was -.29 +/- .12 (P less than .10) pigs per generation. None of the other regression coefficients for the reproductive traits differed from zero. Average backfat thickness, 10th rib backfat thickness, and belly weight increased by .093 +/- .016 cm, .122 +/- .029 cm, and .089 +/- .040 kg, respectively, per generation. Specific gravity, ham weight, shoulder weight, color score, and percentage of muscle decreased -.00086 +/- .00024, -.165 +/- .013 kg, -.104 +/- .011 kg, -.035 +/- .015 points, and -.47 +/- .12%, respectively, per generation in response to the selection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
L. Bunger, R. M Lewis, M. F Rothschild, A. Blasco, U. Renne, and G. Simm
Relationships between quantitative and reproductive fitness traits in animals
Phil Trans R Soc B, July 29, 2005; 360(1459): 1489 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
Z. B. Johnson and R. A. Nugent III
Heritability of body length and measures of body density and their relationship to backfat thickness and loin muscle area in swine
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 1943 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Estany, D. Villalba, M. Tor, D. Cubilo, and J. L. Noguera
Correlated response to selection for litter size in pigs: II. Carcass, meat, and fat quality traits
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2002; 80(10): 2566 - 2573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.