Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 9 2652-2657, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Predicting the profitability of alfalfa silage and pasture feeding systems for Holstein steers

S. J. Ainslie, D. G. Fox and W. A. Knoblauch
Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.

Data from two research trials were used as inputs to a model to project the return to capital of two-phase alfalfa silage and pasture feeding systems for Holstein steers. This approach presents a methodology for applying research data over widely varying conditions. Cattle received a 40% (High = H), 22% (Medium = M), or 8% (Low = L) alfalfa silage diet or grazed an orchardgrass/ryegrass pasture (Pasture = P) during Period 1. During Period 2, cattle consumed a 90% concentrate diet until ultrasonic attenuation predicted that the longissimus muscle contained a small degree of marbling. All systems produced similar carcass grades, so profitability differences resulted from relationships between feed requirements, cost of feed, and cost of time. Cattle grazed on pasture yielded a higher return to capital during Period 1 and over the entire feeding system. Among the other systems, L returned more to capital during Period 1, but over the entire feeding system additional silage returned more when silage cost was less than $32 per 1.02 t (as fed). Above this cost, the continuous 90% concentrate diet yielded a higher return. Cattle implanted with trenbolone acetate and estradiol returned $60 in Trial 1 and $86 in Trial 2 more per animal than did unimplanted steers.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Berthiaume, I. Mandell, L. Faucitano, and C. Lafreniere Comparison of alternative beef production systems based on forage finishing or grain-forage diets with or without growth promotants: 1. Feedlot performance, carcass quality, and production costs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2168 - 2177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]