J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neal, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Irvin, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neal, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Irvin, K. M.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 8 2322-2327, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Correlated changes in reproductive components accompanying 10 generations of selection for improved sow productivity index

S. M. Neal and K. M. Irvin
Department of Animal Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

Reproductive components were compared between a line of sows selected (S) for improved sow productivity index (SPI = 6.5 x number born alive + adjusted 21-d litter weight) and sows from an unselected control (C) line. Generation 9 and 10, second-parity, Landrace sows were chosen from both the S (n = 35) and C (n = 33) line. Sows were slaughtered at a commercial slaughter plant at approximately 75 d of gestation and their reproductive tracts were recovered. Reproductive tracts were evaluated for uterine weight (UTWT), uterine horn length (UTLN), ovulation rate (OR), number of fully formed fetuses (NF), number of mummified fetuses (NM), percentage of fetal survival (FS = NF/OR), fetal space (FSPACE = UTLN/[NF + NM]), and fetal position, sex, and weight. Select-line sows had greater NF (P less than .10) and higher FS (P less than .10) than C-line sows. Select-line sows had longer (P less than .05), and heavier (P less than .01) uteri than C-line sows. However, uterine length adjusted for NF was not different between the two lines. Uterine weight adjusted for NF was greater in S-line sows (P less than .05). Select-line sows had greater total fetal weight (TFWT) (P less than .05) than did C-line sows. Female fetuses positioned between two male fetuses were lighter in weight than all other female fetuses (P less than .01). Male fetuses positioned between two female fetuses did not differ in weight from all other male fetuses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.