J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buntinx, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buntinx, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Burns, J. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 7 2243-2249, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of the Captec chrome controlled-release device for the estimation of fecal output by grazing sheep

S. E. Buntinx, K. R. Pond, D. S. Fisher and J. C. Burns
Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.

Three grazing experiments were conducted to compare actual fecal output (FO) by sheep, determined with fecal collection bags, to fecal output predicted using Captec chromic oxide (Cr2O3) controlled-release capsules. In Exp. 1, 14 crossbred wethers dosed with controlled-release Cr2O3 capsules rotationally grazed four paddocks of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) for 18 d. Total fecal collection and grab samples were taken daily from each animal; feces were dried and assayed for Cr. From d 5 to 12 after dosing, mean actual FO (429 +/- 9.6 g of DM/d) differed (P less than .001) from FO predicted by the capsule (463 +/- 12.8 g of DM/d). The correlation between actual and predicted FO was r = .59. When data were averaged by day, the correlation increased to .82. In Exp. 2, Tifton 44 bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.) was strip-grazed for 30 d by the same 14 wethers used in Exp. 1. Mean actual FO (369 +/- 5.1 g of DM/d) differed (P less than .0001) from predicted FO (415 +/- 9.3 g of DM/d), with a correlation of .60. In Exp. 3, 72 crossbred lambs were blocked by weight (light and heavy) and assigned to six groups of eight wethers (four with fecal bags) and four ewes, allotted randomly to three stocking rates (74, 99, and 148 sheep/ha). Sampling occurred from d 6 to 10 after dosing (Period 1) and d 20 to 24 after dosing (Period 2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.