Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 7 2212-2220, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of administration of growth hormone-releasing factor to sows during late gestation on growth hormone secretion, reproductive traits, and performance of progeny from birth to 100 kilograms live weight

M. Etienne, M. Bonneau, G. Kann and F. Deletang
Station de Recherches Porcines, INRA, St. Gilles, Hermitage, France.

The effects of growth hormone-releasing factor (GHRF) injections to sows during late gestation were investigated in two experiments. In the first one, four treatments were applied to eight catheterized sows according to two 4 x 4 Latin squares: oral administration of 2 mg of pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, per kilogram of BW (PYR group); i.m. injection of 50 micrograms of GHRF/kg BW (GHRF group); a combination of the pyridostigmine and GHRF treatments (PYR+GHRF); or i.m. injection of glucose (control). Pyridostigmine slightly increased the plasma concentration of growth hormone (GH). Growth hormone responses to GHRF and PYR+GHRF treatments were similar, with significantly elevated GH concentrations from 5 to 240 min after GHRF injection. In the second experiment, 36 sows were allocated to two treatments at 102 d of gestation. Until farrowing, they were injected twice daily with 50 micrograms of GHRF/kg BW (GHRF group) or isotonic glucose (control). The DM, N, fat, and energy content of 24 pigs per group was determined at weaning at 22 d. Six pigs per litter had ad libitum access to feed until slaughter at 100 kg BW and their carcasses were evaluated. Treatment with GHRF increased pregnancy duration (114.8 vs 113.6 d, P less than .05), weight of pigs at 13 d (3.69 vs 3.54 kg, P less than .05) and at weaning (5.74 vs 5.48 kg, P less than .05), and improved pig survival (86 vs 71%, P less than .05). Lipid (on a DM basis) and energy contents of the pigs slaughtered at weaning were significantly higher in the GHRF group than in the control group (14.4 vs 12.5% and 2,178 vs 2,029 kcal/kg, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Rehfeldt and G. Kuhn Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E113 - E. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Gatford, J. M. Boyce, K. Blackmore, R. J. Smits, R. G. Campbell, and P. C. Owens Long-term, but not short-term, treatment with somatotropin during pregnancy in underfed pigs increases the body size of progeny at birth J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Draghia-Akli and M. L. Fiorotto A new plasmid-mediated approach to supplement somatotropin production in pigs J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E264 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. S. Khan, M. L. Fiorotto, K. K. Cummings, M. A. Pope, P. A. Brown, and R. Draghia-Akli Maternal GHRH plasmid administration changes pituitary cell lineage and improves progeny growth of pigs Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2003; 285(1): E224 - E231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]