J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Williams, B. L.
Right arrow Articles by et, al.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 7 2207-2211, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

In vitro development of zygotes from prepubertal gilts after microinjection of DNA

B. L. Williams, A. E. Sparks, R. S. Canseco, J. W. Knight, J. L. Johnson, W. H. Velander, R. L. Page, W. N. Drohan, J. M. Young, R. E. Pearson and al. et
Department of Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Blacksburg 24061.

The effect of pronuclear microinjection of DNA and culture in excised mouse oviducts on the development of porcine zygotes was assessed in this study. Precocious ovulation was induced in prepubertal gilts with pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin and hCG. Zygotes received either pronuclear microinjection of buffer alone, buffer containing a DNA construct, or no microinjection. Zygotes were cultured in vitro in either modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate medium (KRB) for 144 h or in mouse oviduct (MO) explant culture with KRB for 48, 72, 96, or 120 h. Pronuclear microinjection of DNA resulted in a lower (P less than .05) cleavage index (CI) than did buffer or no microinjection (CI 2.16 +/- .10 vs 2.80 +/- .13 and 2.93 +/- .10). The CI loss was greatest for DNA-injected zygotes at the two-cell stage of development. Coculture of zygotes in MO resulted in a higher CI (P less than .01) than did culture in KRB. Culture in MO for 72 h was the most beneficial system compared with MO for 48, 96, or 120 h (P less than .05; CI 3.25 +/- .12 vs 2.66 +/- .18, 2.79 +/- .14, and 2.40 +/- .14, respectively). Microinjection of DNA, not merely the mechanical procedure, was detrimental to early zygote development and may be the cause of low pregnancy rates.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.