J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, F. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, F. L.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 7 2159-2166, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Development of a multivariate yield grade equation to predict compositional traits in mature cow carcasses

R. R. Hodgson, K. E. Belk, J. W. Savell, H. R. Cross and F. L. Williams
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-2471.

Data from 68 cow carcasses were used to develop a new yield grading system. First principal component (FPC) values for compositional attributes (LNFT = separable lean weight/[lean+fat weight] x 100, LNBN = separable lean weight/[lean+bone+connective tissue weights] x 100, and BTPR = [defatted lean from the round, loin, rib, and chuck]/side weight x 100) were determined. The first component explained 83.5% of the standardized variance and load values were .63, -.52, and .58, respectively. The resulting FPC values ranged from -1.93 to 1.89. The linear regression of LNFT, LNBN, and BTPR (dependent variables) on FPC (independent variable) explained a significant amount of variation (P less than .001) in each case and resulted in R2-values of .98, .67, and .85, respectively. A best-fit yield grade equation, developed to predict FPC, included adjusted fat thickness (ADF), percentage of kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH), and overall muscling grade (OM). The equation, FPC = 2.04 - (.67 x ADF) - (.21 x KPH) - (.0016 x OM), explained a significant amount (P less than .001) of variation in FPC with R2 = .94 and residual standard deviation = .25. Simple correlations for ADF, KPH, and OM with FPC were -.87, -.71, and -.80, respectively. Cow carcasses were assigned to one of three grades based on FPC values that corresponded with predetermined levels of LNFT, LNBN, and BTPR. These grades generally had smaller CV than existing grades. When used in conjunction with quality grades, proposed grades could be more useful to the cow meat industry.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.