J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howard, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, S. R.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 4 1227-1237, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Voluntary intake and ingestive behavior of steers grazing Johnstone or endophyte-infected Kentucky-31 tall fescue

M. D. Howard, R. B. Muntifering, N. W. Bradley, G. E. Mitchell Jr and S. R. Lowry
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215.

Effects of grazing low-endophyte (Acremonium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams, less than 1% infection) Johnstone (J) or high-endophyte (60% infection) Kentucky-31 (K) tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) on grazing behavior and voluntary intake were studied. Six Angus steers (average initial BW = 326 kg) grazed 1.21-ha plots of each forage cultivar (three steers per cultivar) in four 28-d periods beginning May 27. Daytime observations (0630 until 2130) revealed that J steers spent more (P less than .10) time grazing and lying down and took more (P less than .05) prehensile bites than K steers did; conversely, steers grazing K spent more (P less than .10) time standing and idling than J steers did. Idling time showed a forage x period interaction (P less than .10). Mean OM bite size (grams per bite) was not affected (P greater than .10) by forage but differed (P less than .10) among periods. Limited nighttime observations (2130 until 0630) revealed no effects (P greater than .10) of forage on grazing time or number of prehensile bites taken. Voluntary intakes of OM and NDF did not differ (P greater than .10) between steers grazing J and K; however, a forage x period interaction (P less than .10) existed such that, during Period 1, steers grazing J had greater (P less than .01) OM and NDF intakes than did steers grazing K. These data suggest that cattle grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue display altered daytime grazing behavior and that reduction of voluntary intake attributable to endophyte infection may be less severe under free-grazing than has been reported for controlled environmental conditions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
L. K. McClanahan, G. E. Aiken, and C. T. Dougherty
Case Study: Influence of Rough Hair Coats and Steroid Implants on the Performance and Physiology of Steers Grazing Endophyte-Infected Tall Fescue in the Summer
Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 269 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. H. Watson, M. A. McCann, J. A. Parish, C. S. Hoveland, F. N. Thompson, and J. H. Bouton
Productivity of cow-calf pairs grazing tall fescue pastures infected with either the wild-type endophyte or a nonergot alkaloid-producing endophyte strain, AR542
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2004; 82(11): 3388 - 3393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Browning Jr.
Effects of endophyte-infected tall fescue on indicators of thermal status and growth in Hereford and Senepol steers
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2004; 82(2): 634 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Parish, M. A. McCann, R. H. Watson, N. N. Paiva, C. S. Hoveland, A. H. Parks, B. L. Upchurch, N. S. Hill, and J. H. Bouton
Use of nonergot alkaloid-producing endophytes for alleviating tall fescue toxicosis in stocker cattle
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2856 - 2868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.