J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brethour, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brethour, J. R.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 4 1039-1044, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The repeatability and accuracy of ultrasound in measuring backfat of cattle

J. R. Brethour
Kansas State University, Fort Hays Branch Experiment Station 67601.

Repeatability of ultrasound backfat measurements was determined on 217 cattle, and the association of ultrasound and carcass backfat measurements was evaluated with 580 animals. The correlation (repeatability) between consecutive ultrasound measurements was .975. Average difference between two ultrasound measures was .72 mm and error size was directly related (P less than .001) to the amount of backfat. Ultrasound measures averaged 8% (P less than .001) less than carcass measures. The average absolute difference between these two measures was 1.57 mm. Discrepancies were (P less than .001) larger when backfat was thicker; cattle with backfat measuring less than 10 mm averaged 1.43 mm absolute difference, whereas those with backfat greater than 10 mm averaged 1.89 mm. The variance of the discrepancies was partitioned into three components: ultrasound measurement error (14%), drift related to intercept and slope (15%), and residual (71%). The residual component may have represented errors in carcass measurement. In a subsequent trial with 175 cattle, average difference between ultrasound and carcass backfat measurements was reduced to 1.19 mm. Also, the slope and intercept virtually mimicked the isopach. Ultrasound measures can be more precise (minutely exact) and accurate (close to the true value) than carcass measures for assessing absolute backfat thickness in cattle. Elements of measurement protocol that may improve ultrasound technique are imparted in the manuscript.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. L. Sherman, J. D. Nkrumah, B. M. Murdoch, C. Li, Z. Wang, A. Fu, and S. S. Moore
Polymorphisms and haplotypes in the bovine neuropeptide Y, growth hormone receptor, ghrelin, insulin-like growth factor 2, and uncoupling proteins 2 and 3 genes and their associations with measures of growth, performance, feed efficiency, and carcass merit in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 1 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, D. H. Crews Jr., and S. S. Moore
Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feed intake and measures of efficiency with growth and carcass merit of beef cattle
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2711 - 2720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel
Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Nkrumah, C. Li, J. Yu, C. Hansen, D. H. Keisler, and S. S. Moore
Polymorphisms in the bovine leptin promoter associated with serum leptin concentration, growth, feed intake, feeding behavior, and measures of carcass merit
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 20 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Nkrumah, J. A. Basarab, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, A. Ammoura, S. Guercio, C. Hansen, C. Li, B. Benkel, B. Murdoch, et al.
Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2451 - 2459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. B. Wall, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, R. G. Tait Jr., and W. D. Busby
Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1621 - 1629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. H. Crews Jr., N. H. Shannon, R. E. Crews, and R. A. Kemp
Weaning, yearling, and preharvest ultrasound measures of fat andmuscle area in steers, bulls, and heifers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2817 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.