Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 3 930-941, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Application of ultrasound for feeding and finishing animals: a review

P. L. Houghton and L. M. Turlington
Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.

The ability to evaluate carcass traits in live animals is of value to research, educational, and industry personnel. Ultrasonic technology has been tested since the early 1950s and continues to be under investigation as a means of accomplishing this task. The accuracy of ultrasound in predicting carcass traits is variable and is dependent on species, ultrasonic instrumentation, and(or) the skill of the technician. Based on this review, the ranges of correlation coefficients (r) for carcass traits as predicted by ultrasound to the respective carcass measurement are as follows: swine (fat .20 to .94; longissimus muscle .27 to .93), sheep (fat .42 to .95; longissimus muscle .36 to .79) and beef (fat .45 to .96; longissimus muscle .20 to .94; marbling .20 to .91). Although these correlation coefficients give an indication of the accuracy of ultrasound, it should be noted that these statistics do not reflect population variation or bias. Applications of ultrasound in swine finishing programs include the successful prediction of market weight carcass characteristics and the prediction of percentage of lean cuts before slaughter. In contrast, the application of ultrasound in lamb finishing programs has met with limited success. Most data indicate that weight and(or) visual estimations of fat are at least as accurate as ultrasound predictions of carcass composition. In beef finishing programs, ultrasound has, at times, been used successfully to predict fat and muscle traits before slaughter and beef carcass chemical composition. The ability to predict marbling, however, remains unclear and requires further investigation. Ultrasound has also been used in beef finishing programs to predict days on feed to a constant body compositional end point. When summarized, these data indicate that a single ultrasonic measurement of fat can be helpful in predicting days on feed in yearling cattle. When used alone, however, a single backfat measurement does not provide adequate accuracy. Therefore, factors such as age, sex, breed type, weight, and hip height are needed to help predict days on feed more accurately.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. D. Leeds, M. R. Mousel, D. R. Notter, H. N. Zerby, C. A. Moffet, and G. S. Lewis B-mode, real-time ultrasound for estimating carcass measures in live sheep: Accuracy of ultrasound measures and their relationships with carcass yield and value J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3203 - 3214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. A. Pyatt, L. L. Berger, D. B. Faulkner, P. M. Walker, and S. L. Rodriguez-Zas Factors affecting carcass value and profitability in early-weaned Simmental steers: II. Days on feed endpoints and sorting strategies J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2926 - 2937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Mimbs, T. D. Pringle, M. J. Azain, S. A. Meers, and T. A. Armstrong Effects of ractopamine on performance and composition of pigs phenotypically sorted into fat and lean groups J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1361 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Stouffer History of Ultrasound in Animal Science J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2004; 23(5): 577 - 584. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 676 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Newcom, T. J. Baas, and J. F. Lampe Prediction of intramuscular fat percentage in live swine using real-time ultrasound J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3046 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]