Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 2 484-491, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality, and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle

J. M. DeJarnette, R. G. Saacke, J. Bame and C. J. Vogler
Department of Dairy Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.

Accessory sperm number and its relationship to fertilization and embryo quality was evaluated in cattle after nonsurgical recovery of ova or embryos 6 d after insemination. Efforts to alter accessory sperm number per ovum included 1) blockage of retrograde sperm loss at insemination using a modified insemination device, 2) elevated sperm number per inseminate (40 x 10(6) vs 20 x 10(6], and 3) alteration in semen quality (percentage of viable and morphologically normal sperm in the inseminate). None of these efforts affected accessory sperm number per ovum or embryo. However, blockage of retrograde semen flow for 3 h or use of semen of below-average quality (decreased percentage of viable and morphologically normal sperm) resulted in significant decreases in number of viable embryos and increases in number of degenerate embryos and unfertilized ova compared with conventional insemination (P less than .03) and use of semen with an average percentage of viable and morphologically normal sperm (P less than .06). Number of accessory sperm per embryo or ovum was positively related to fertilization and embryo quality (P less than .05). Mean accessory sperm +/- SD and the median value (in parentheses) for unfertilized ova, degenerate embryos, and embryos classified fair to poor and excellent to good were, respectively, .3 +/- .8 (0), 5.4 +/- 8.9 (1.0), 15.8 +/- 28.6 (3.5), and 16.9 +/- 29.5 (5.0). We conclude that efforts to improve accessory sperm numbers per embryo or ovum failed and that high variation and skewness of accessory sperm toward 0 may make median values more meaningful than means.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Ardon, D. Helms, E. Sahin, H. Bollwein, E. Topfer-Petersen, and D. Waberski Chromatin-unstable boar spermatozoa have little chance of reaching oocytes in vivo Reproduction, April 1, 2008; 135(4): 461 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Portaluppi and J. S. Stevenson Pregnancy Rates in Lactating Dairy Cows After Presynchronization of Estrous Cycles and Variations of the Ovsynch Protocol J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Willenburg, G. M. Miller, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, and R. V. Knox Effect of boar exposure at time of insemination on factors influencing fertility in gilts J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Sartori, R. Sartor-Bergfelt, S. A. Mertens, J. N. Guenther, J. J. Parrish, and M. C. Wiltbank Fertilization and Early Embryonic Development in Heifers and Lactating Cows in Summer and Lactating and Dry Cows in Winter J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 2803 - 2812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]