|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 12 4018-4035, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
D. J. Patterson, R. C. Perry, G. H. Kiracofe, R. A. Bellows, R. B. Staigmiller and L. R. Corah
Department of Animal Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215.
Management of replacement beef heifers should focus on factors that enhance physiological processes that promote puberty. Age at puberty is important as a production trait when heifers are bred to calve as 2-yr-olds and in systems that impose restricted breeding periods. Calving by 24 mo of age is necessary to obtain maximum lifetime productivity. Because the reproductive system is the last major organ system to mature, factors that influence puberty are critical. The influence of environment on the sequence of events leading to puberty in the heifer is dictated largely by the nutritional status of the animal and related effects on growth rate and development. Management strategies have been designed to ensure that heifers reach a prebreeding target weight that supports optimum reproductive performance, and consequences of inadequate or excessive development have been evaluated. Those strategies are based on evidence linking postweaning nutritional development with key reproductive events that include age at puberty and first breeding, conception, pregnancy loss, incidence and severity of dystocia, and postpartum interval to estrus. Management alternatives that ultimately affect lifetime productivity and reproductive performance of heifers begin at birth and include decisions that involve growth-promoting implants, creep-feeding, breed type and(or) species, birth date and weaning weight, social interaction, sire selection, and exogenous hormonal treatments to synchronize or induce estrus. Basic and applied future research efforts should converge to match in a realistic manner the production potential of the animal with available resources. Strategies that incorporate consideration of nutrition, genetics, and emerging management techniques will need to be tested to enable producers to make decisions that result in profit. This review evaluates the current status of knowledge relating to management of the replacement beef heifer and serves to stimulate research needed to enhance management techniques to ensure puberty at an optimal age.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Cammack, M. G. Thomas, and R. M. Enns Review: Reproductive Traits and Their Heritabilities in Beef Cattle Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 517 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3043 - 3052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Martin, K. W. Creighton, J. A. Musgrave, T. J. Klopfenstein, R. T. Clark, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 451 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Roberts, S. I. Paisley, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil Effects of restricted feeding of beef heifers during the postweaning period on growth, efficiency, and ultrasound carcass characteristics J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2740 - 2745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Martin, A. S. Cupp, R. J. Rasby, Z. C. Hall, and R. N. Funston Utilization of dried distillers grains for developing beef heifers J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2298 - 2303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Grings, T. W. Geary, R. E. Short, and M. D. MacNeil Beef heifer development within three calving systems J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 2048 - 2058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yonai, K. Kaneyama, N. Miyashita, S. Kobayashi, Y. Goto, T. Bettpu, and T. Nagai Growth, Reproduction, and Lactation in Somatic Cell Cloned Cows with Short Telomeres J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2005; 88(11): 4097 - 4110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Funston and G. H. Deutscher Comparison of target breeding weight and breeding date for replacement beef heifers and effects on subsequent reproduction and calf performance J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 3094 - 3099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. E. Pinchak, D. R. Tolleson, M. McCloy, L. J. Hunt, R. J. Gill, R. J. Ansley, and S. J. Bevers Morbidity effects on productivity and profitability of stocker cattle grazing in the Southern Plains J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2773 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yilmaz, M. E. Davis, and R. C. M. Simmen Estimation of (co)variance components for reproductive traits in Angus beef cattle divergently selected for blood serum IGF-I concentration J Anim Sci, August 1, 2004; 82(8): 2285 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.P. Enright, M. Taneja, D. Schreiber, J. Riesen, X.C. Tian, J.E. Fortune, and X. Yang Reproductive Characteristics of Cloned Heifers Derived from Adult Somatic Cells Biol Reprod, February 1, 2002; 66(2): 291 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |