J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cundiff, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cundiff, L. V.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 12 4006-4017, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Genetic effects on beef heifer puberty and subsequent reproduction

L. C. Martin, J. S. Brinks, R. M. Bourdon and L. V. Cundiff
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.

Significant genetic variation exists within and between breeds of beef cattle for age at puberty (AP). In general, faster-gaining breed groups of larger mature size reach puberty at a later age than do slower-gaining breed groups of smaller mature size; breeds selected for milk production reach puberty at younger ages than do those breeds not selected for milk production. Heterosis, independent of heterosis effects on weight, influences most measures of puberty in females and scrotal circumference (SC) in males. Crossbred heifers reach puberty at younger ages and heavier weights than their straightbred counterparts. Scrotal circumference has been shown to be an excellent indicator of AP in yearling bulls. Furthermore, a favorable genetic relationship exists between SC in bulls and AP of female offspring. Beef cattle breeders may take a direct approach to breeding for AP and subsequent reproduction by directly selecting for measures of fertility such as SC. However, an indirect approach, involving selection for an array of traits that provide an appropriate "genetic environment" for the expression of fertility (i.e., size, milk production, calving ease) may be preferred. Although seedstock producers are limited to making change through within-breed selection, commercial producers can take advantage of both within- and between-breed selection as well as crossbreeding to achieve the same goal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
K. M. Cammack, M. G. Thomas, and R. M. Enns
Review: Reproductive Traits and Their Heritabilities in Beef Cattle
Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 517 - 528.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. F. Cooke, J. D. Arthington, B. R. Austin, and J. V. Yelich
Effects of acclimation to handling on performance, reproductive, and physiological responses of Brahman-crossbred heifers
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3403 - 3412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, E. E. Grings, R. C. Waterman, and M. D. MacNeil
Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3043 - 3052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. A. Cushman, M. F. Allan, L. A. Kuehn, W. M. Snelling, A. S. Cupp, and H. C. Freetly
Evaluation of antral follicle count and ovarian morphology in crossbred beef cows: Investigation of influence of stage of the estrous cycle, age, and birth weight
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2009; 87(6): 1971 - 1980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. J. Garrick and B. L. Golden
Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E11 - E18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Mc Parland, J. F. Kearney, D. E. MacHugh, and D. P. Berry
Inbreeding effects on postweaning production traits, conformation, and calving performance in Irish beef cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2008; 86(12): 3338 - 3347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. A. Cushman, M. F. Allan, R. M. Thallman, and L. V. Cundiff
Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VII): Influence of postpartum interval and estrous cycle length on fertility
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2156 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rios-Utrera, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, R. M. Koch, M. E. Dikeman, M. Koohmaraie, and L. D. Van Vleck
Effects of age, weight, and fat slaughter end points on estimates of breed and retained heterosis effects for carcass traits
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2006; 84(1): 63 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Eler, J. A. I. V. Silva, J. L. Evans, J. B. S. Ferraz, F. Dias, and B. L. Golden
Additive genetic relationships between heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference in Nellore cattle
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2004; 82(9): 2519 - 2527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.