J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, B. D.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 70, Issue 1 29-37, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Evaluation of ultrasound for prediction of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in feedlot steers

M. T. Smith, J. W. Oltjen, H. G. Dolezal, D. R. Gill and B. D. Behrens
Animal Science Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078.

Four hundred fifty-two yearling steers from two experiments were measured for subcutaneous fat thickness and longissimus muscle area between the 12th and 13th ribs using real-time linear array ultrasound equipment. Ultrasonic predictions were compared to corresponding carcass measurements to determine accuracy of ultrasound measurements. In Exp. 1, 74% of the ultrasonic estimates of fat thickness were within 2.54 mm of carcass values (r = .81) and muscle area was predicted within 6.45 cm2 for 47% of all carcasses (r = .43). Although similar correlation coefficients between ultrasonic and carcass fat thickness were obtained in Exp. 2 (r = .82), estimates were more biased; only 62% of ultrasound estimates were within 2.54 mm of carcass measurements. Improvement in longissimus muscle area estimates was noted in Exp. 2, in which 54% of ultrasonic estimates were within 6.45 cm2 of carcass values (r = .63). The extremes for each trait proved most difficult to predict; fat thickness was underestimated on fatter cattle and muscle area was underpredicted on more heavily muscled steers. Ultrasonic measurements of fat thickness are precise and accurate in determining carcass fat thickness, but muscle area estimates are inconsistent and warrant further investigation.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. B. Smith, M. R. Dally, R. D. Sainz, K. L. Rodrigue, and A. M. Oberbauer
Enhanced skeletal growth of sheep heterozygous for an inactivated fibroblast growth factor receptor 3
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 2942 - 2949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. J. Mimbs, T. D. Pringle, M. J. Azain, S. A. Meers, and T. A. Armstrong
Effects of ractopamine on performance and composition of pigs phenotypically sorted into fat and lean groups
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1361 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. M. Stelzleni, T. L. Perkins, A. H. Brown Jr., F. W. Pohlman, Z. B. Johnson, and B. A. Sandelin
Genetic parameter estimates of yearling live animal ultrasonic measurements in Brangus cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3150 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. H. Crews Jr., N. H. Shannon, R. E. Crews, and R. A. Kemp
Weaning, yearling, and preharvest ultrasound measures of fat andmuscle area in steers, bulls, and heifers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2817 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society of Animal Science.