J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bartle, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bartle, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, R. L.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 9 3461-3466, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dietary roughage regimen for feedlot steers: reduced roughage level (2%) during the mid-finishing period

S. J. Bartle and R. L. Preston
Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409.

Because roughage in feedlot diets is one of the most expensive ingredients on an energy basis, regimens that minimize roughage usage are of interest. Crossbred steers of British breeds (n = 112, initial BW = 405 kg) were used to compare the feeding of diets containing 2% roughage from d 22 through 84 and 10% roughage from d 85 to finish (d 133; 2/10%) to the feeding of 10% roughage throughout the finishing period (10/10%); all diets were based on steam-flaked sorghum grain and contained monensin and tylosin. When the 2% roughage diet was fed, steers consumed less feed (6.8 vs 7.8 kg/d, P less than .01), tended to gain less (1.11 vs 1.20 kg/d, P = .13), and were numerically more efficient (16.5 vs 15.5 kg of gain/100 kg of DMI, P greater than .2) than steers fed the 10% roughage diet (10/10%). After the roughage content was increased from 2 to 10% on d 85 (all steers fed 10% roughage), steers fed the 2/10% regimen had greater DMI (8.4 vs 8.0 kg/d, P = .08) and ADG (1.29 vs 1.09 kg, P = .06), and tended to be more efficient (15.4 vs 13.6 kg of gain/100 kg of DMI, P = .10) than steers fed the 10/10% regimen. Steers fed the two regimens had similar (P greater than .2) overall gain performance. The 2/10% regimen tended to have a greater percentage of Choice carcasses (58 vs 42%, P = .14) and numerically more liver abscesses (24 vs 15%, P greater than .2) than the 10/10% regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Animal Science.