Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 7 3067-3071, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Protein and fiber digestion by steers grazing winter annuals and supplemented with ruminal escape protein

R. S. Donaldson, M. A. McCann, H. E. Amos and C. S. Hoveland
Dept. of Anim. Sci., University of Georgia, Athens 30602.

Six abomasally cannulated Hereford steers (12 mo of age, 300 +/- 10 kg) grazing annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) paddocks were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design to determine effects of ruminal escape protein (EP) supplementation on forage intake, fiber digestion, and protein flow to the intestine. Steers were fed one of three isoenergetic supplements: high ruminal escape protein (HEP), low ruminal escape protein (LEP), or corn, which supplied an estimated .25, .125, or 0 kg of EP/d in addition to EP supplied by corn. Fish meal (FM) and distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS) were sources of EP; FM provided 66.7% and DDGS provided 33.3% of estimated EP. Steers were adjusted to each supplement for 7 d before a 4-d collection period. Both total and forage DMI responded quadratically (P less than .03 and P less than .07, respectively) to EP supplementation. Total tract DM digestion tended (P less than .13) to increase linearly with EP supplementation. Abomasal total CP flow increased linearly (P less than .10) as supplemental EP increased. Crude protein flow in steers receiving HEP, LEP, and corn was 1,137, 1,027, and 844 g/d, respectively. Likewise, abomasal nonammonia N (NAN) tended to be greater (P less than .15, linear) for steers receiving HEP. Nonammonia N flows were 1,044, 955, and 771 g/d for steers receiving HEP, LEP, and corn, respectively. Abomasal ammonia flow did not differ (P less than .20) among treatments, nor did reticuloruminal fiber digestion (P less than .20). These data indicate that EP can increase postruminal protein flow and will not negatively affect fiber digestion in steers grazing annual ryegrass pastures.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. L. Atkinson, C. D. Toone, and P. A. Ludden Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on site and extent of digestion and ruminal characteristics in lambs fed low-quality forage J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3322 - 3330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Atkinson, C. D. Toone, T. J. Robinson, D. L. Harmon, and P. A. Ludden Effects of supplemental ruminally degradable protein versus increasing amounts of supplemental ruminally undegradable protein on nitrogen retention, apparent digestibility, and nutrient flux across visceral tissues in lambs fed low-quality forage J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3331 - 3339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. W. Salisbury, C. R. Krehbiel, T. T. Ross, C. L. Schultz, and L. L. Melton Effects of supplemental protein type on intake, nitrogen balance, and site, and extent of digestion in whiteface wethers consuming low-quality grass hay J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3567 - 3576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Bohnert, C. S. Schauer, M. L. Bauer, and T. DelCurto Influence of rumen protein degradability and supplementation frequency on steers consuming low-quality forage: I. Site of digestion and microbial efficiency J Anim Sci, November 1, 2002; 80(11): 2967 - 2977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]