J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pointillart, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kann, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pointillart, A.
Right arrow Articles by Kann, G.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 4 1454-1460, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effect of human growth hormone-releasing factor on bone and mineral metabolism in growing pigs

A. Pointillart, M. Bonneau and G. Kann
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Jouy-en-Josas, France.

Little information is available on the effects of growth hormone (GH) and growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF and GHRH) treatment on bone metabolism in pigs. Thus, tibial bending moments and ash contents were studied in 12, 6-wk-old pigs weighing 13 +/- .2 kg. Six pigs (GRF group) were injected s.c. twice daily with 75 micrograms GRF (hGRF [1-29] NH2)/kg BW for 52 d and six remained untreated (control group, C). Average daily gain was slightly (5%; P less than .10) increased in treated pigs. At slaughter, plasma measurements related to calcium homeostasis, such as concentrations of Ca, inorganic P, and vitamin D metabolites (25-OH and 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3), were not changed by GRF injection. At slaughter, plasma GH levels were 3.3 times greater in treated (11.3 +/- 3 ng/ml) than in untreated pigs (3.4 +/- .5 ng/ml, P less than .02), whereas those of insulin-like growth factor I were increased by approximately 38%. No difference was observed between the two groups at slaughter in tibial weight, density, bending moment, ash relative to bone volume (29 +/- 1 vs 30 +/- 2 g/100 cm3, GRF vs C), total ash content, or ash relative to dry matter in cortical or medullary bone. Our GRF treatment did not affect bone and mineral metabolism in young, growing pigs.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Animal Science.