J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hotovy, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Seidel, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hotovy, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Seidel, G. E., Jr

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 3 940-946, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Variation among twin beef cattle in maintenance energy requirements

S. K. Hotovy, K. A. Johnson, D. E. Johnson, G. E. Carstens, R. M. Bourdon and G. E. Seidel Jr
Dept. of Anim. Sci., Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523.

The genetic variation in energy expenditures of cattle at fasting (FHP) and maintenance (MEm) was determined by using 12 pairs of monozygous twins at 20 mo of age. The pairs were of two breed types, eight Angus x Hereford (three steers, five heifers) and four Barzona x Hereford (three steers, one heifer). The heifers were 132 +/- 13 d pregnant at the time of measurement. The pairs were fed at 1.15 x maintenance energy requirements for a minimum of 30 d prior to heat production (HP) measurements in dual indirect respiration calorimetry chambers. The diet fed was cracked corn:alfalfa hay (45:55) with a determined ME of 2.47 +/- .02 Mcal/kg DM. This diet was fed individually for 7 d prior to and during two consecutive 22-h HP measurements. The animals then were fasted for 2 d and fasting heat production measurements (FHP) were made on d 3 and 4 of the fast. Metabolizable energy required for MEm was calculated iteratively by assuming a semi-log relationship between HP and metabolizable energy intake. There were no differences (P greater than .10) in measured energy expenditures due to different breed type. The FHP and efficiency of ME use for MEm (Km) were similar between sexes, although heifers had lower (P less than .025) MEm than steers. Twin pair effects were detected for FHP (P less than .005) and MEm (P less than .05) but not for Km. Broad sense heritability estimates were calculated as the intraclass correlation between members of monozygous twin pairs. Heritability estimates for MEm, FHP, and Km were .52 +/- .22, .75 +/- .13, and .34 +/- .27, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
M. Derno, W. Jentsch, M. Schweigel, S. Kuhla, C. C. Metges, and H.-D. Matthes
Measurements of heat production for estimation of maintenance energy requirements of Hereford steers
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2590 - 2597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
D. E. Johnson, C. L. Ferrell, and T. G. Jenkins
The history of energetic efficiency research: Where have we been and where are we going?
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(13_suppl_1): E27 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Animal Science.