J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Notter, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cundiff, L. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Notter, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cundiff, L. V.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 12 4763-4776, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Across-breed expected progeny differences: use of within-breed expected progeny differences to adjust breed evaluations for sire sampling and genetic trend

D. R. Notter and L. V. Cundiff
Dept. of Anim. Sci., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.

Data on 2,034 F1 calves sired by Angus, Hereford, Polled Hereford, Charolais, Limousin, Simmental, Gelbvieh, and Tarentaise bulls with Hereford or Angus dams and data on 3,686 three-breed-cross calves with 700 F1 dams of the same breed crosses were used for this study. Traits analyzed were birth, weaning, yearling, and 420-d weights (BWT, WW, YW, and W420, respectively) of F1 calves and WW of three-breed-cross calves. Expected progeny differences from national cattle evaluation programs for sires of F1 calves and cows for BWT, WW, YW, and net maternal ability (milk) were used to assess their value in prediction of crossbred performance. Regressions of actual F1 calf performance on sire EPD were positive for BWT (1.09 +/- .12 kg/kg of BWT EPD), WW (.79 +/- .14 kg/kg of WW EPD), YW (1.44 +/- .16 kg/kg of YW EPD), and W420 (1.66 kg/kg of YW EPD). These regression coefficients were similar to the expected value of 1.0 for BWT and WW but were larger than expected for YW and W420. Regressions of actual three-breed-cross calf WW on milk and WW EPD of their maternal grandsires were .95 +/- .14 and .42 +/- .10 kg/kg, respectively, and differed little from their expectations of 1.0 and .5, respectively. Observed breed of sire means for each trait were adjusted for sire sampling by using EPD regressions to adjust them to the average EPD of all sires of each breed born in 1970.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
B. L. Golden, D. J. Garrick, and L. L. Benyshek
Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E3 - E10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
D. J. Garrick and B. L. Golden
Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E11 - E18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
L. D. Van Vleck, L. V. Cundiff, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford, and M. Koohmaraie
Across-breed adjustment factors for expected progeny differences for carcass traits
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1369 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Newman, A. Reverter, and D. J. Johnston
Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicusxBos taurus crosses in Australia
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2002; 80(7): 1801 - 1808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Animal Science.