Journal of Animal Science, Vol 69, Issue 1 318-327, Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Nutrient utilization by sheep fed forage grown on soil treated with fluidized-bed combustion residue

M. A. Cochran, H. D. Perry, J. P. Fontenot and V. G. Allen
Dept. of Anim. Sci., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061.

A mineral balance trial was conducted with 18 wether lambs fed sun-cured hay harvested from pastures located on a reclaimed strip-mined site. The following soil applications were made during each of 3 yr: 1) none, 2) dolomitic limestone and 3) fluidized-bed combustion residue (FBCR). Because FBCR had half the buffering capacity of limestone, it was applied at twice the rate of limestone. Apparent digestibility of hemicellulose was higher (P less than .05) for limestone-amended forage than for FBCR-amended forage (70.2 vs 67.0%), and apparent digestibility of cellulose was higher (P less than .05) for amended forages (66.7%) than for the control (63.9%). Apparent absorption and retention of N were similar among treatments, when expressed as a percentage of intake. Lambs fed control forage were in negative Ca balance, lower (P less than .01) than with amended forages. Apparent absorption and retention of Mg and Fe (g/d basis) were higher (P less than .05) for lambs on the limestone treatment than for lambs on the FBCR treatment. Apparent absorption of S was higher (P less than .01) for lambs on the FBCR treatment than for those on the limestone treatment. These differences were related to differences in mineral concentrations of the forages. Serum P was lower (P less than .05) for lambs fed FBCR-treated forage than for lambs fed limestone-treated forage (10.1 vs 12.9 mg/dl). Soil amendment with FBCR did not have deleterious effects on digestibility or mineral metabolism; in fact, it may have enhanced utilization of Ca and S and improved digestibility of some fiber components by lambs.