Journal of Animal Science, Vol 68, Issue 4 1139-1150, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Influence of grain and monensin supplementation on ruminal fermentation, intake, digesta kinetics and incidence and severity of frothy bloat in steers grazing winter wheat pastures

M. E. Branine and M. L. Galyean
Dept. of Anim. and Range Sci., New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003.

Three 10-d collection periods (April 4 to 14, early April, EApr; April 23 to May 3, late April, LApr; May 10 to 20, 1984, mid-May, MMay) were conducted to evaluate effects of no supplement (C), .5 kg-head-1.d-1 (as-fed basis) supplemental grain (steam-flaked milo, G) or G plus 170 mg monensin.head-1.d-1 (M) on forage intake and digestion by 12 ruminally cannulated beef steers (four/treatment; avg initially BW = 393 kg) grazing irrigated winter wheat pasture. Ruminal pH was greater (P less than .01) for M than for C or G during EApr but was not altered by treatments in LApr or MMay. Compared with C, ruminal NH3 was decreased (P less than .10) by G and M (5 h after supplementation) in EApr, decreased (P less than .05) by G (2h) and increased (P less than .05) by M (8 h) in LApr and decreased (P less than .10) by G (-1h) in MMay. Treatments had little influence on total VFA concentrations or on molar proportions of acetate and propionate. Butyrate molar proportion was decreased (P less than .10) by M during EApr and LApr, but not during MMay. Monensin increased (P less than .05) fluid passage rate compared with C and G in EApr but not in other periods, Particulate passage measurements did not differ (P greater than .10) among treatments within periods. Forage DM intake was not influenced (P greater than .10) by supplementation during any period. Extent of in situ forage DM disappearance was greater (P less than .10) for M than for C or G during EApr (12 and 30 h of incubation) but was not different (P greater than .10) in LApr or MMay. Incidence of frothy bloat was decreased (P less than .05) by M during EApr; this reduction may have been related to effects of M on ruminal pH, forage digestion and fluid passage.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Akins, E. B. Kegley, K. P. Coffey, J. D. Caldwell, K. S. Lusby, J. C. Moore, and W. K. Coblentz Comparison of bloat potential between a variety of soft-red versus a variety of hard-red winter wheat forage J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3278 - 3287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. T. MacKown, B. F. Carver, and J. T. Edwards Occurrence of Condensed Tannins in Wheat and Feasibility for Reducing Pasture Bloat Crop Sci., November 24, 2008; 48(6): 2470 - 2480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. T. Vasconcelos and M. L. Galyean ASAS Centennial Paper: Contributions in the Journal of Animal Science to understanding cattle metabolic and digestive disorders J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1711 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Chabot, C. D. Chabot, L. K. Conway, and S. A. Soto-Navarro Effect of fat supplementation and wheat pasture maturity on forage intake and digestion characteristics of steers grazing wheat pasture J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1263 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Min, W. E. Pinchak, J. D. Fulford, and R. Puchala Wheat pasture bloat dynamics, in vitro ruminal gas production, and potential bloat mitigation with condensed tannins J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(6): 1322 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. W. Horn, P. A. Beck, J. G. Andrae, and S. I. Paisley Designing supplements for stocker cattle grazing wheat pasture J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E69 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. O. Tedeschi, D. G. Fox, and T. P. Tylutki Potential Environmental Benefits of Ionophores in Ruminant Diets J. Environ. Qual., September 1, 2003; 32(5): 1591 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]