|
|
||||||||
Journal of Animal Science, Vol 68, Issue 2 532-542, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
T. DelCurto, R. C. Cochran, L. R. Corah, A. A. Beharka, E. S. Vanzant and D. E. Johnson
Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506.
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of supplemental protein concentration on the intake and utilization of dormant range forage by beef cattle. In Exp. 1,97 pregnant Hereford x Angus cows (avg wt = 454 kg) were assigned randomly to three isocaloric treatment supplements: 1) low protein (LP), 13% CP; 2) moderate protein (MP), 25% CP; and 3) high protein (HP), 39% CP. In Exp. 2, 15 ruminally and 12 esophageally cannulated steers (avg wt = 319 and 355 kg, respectively) were assigned randomly to LP, MP and HP treatments and were used in a 22-d winter grazing trial to evaluate forage intake and utilization characteristics. In Exp. 1, cow body condition (BC) and BW changes responded in linear (P less than .01) and quadratic (P less than .01) fashions to increasing protein concentration, with MP and HP displaying the least BC and BW loss from trial initiation (d 1) through d 84. From d 84 to calving (avg calving date = d 120), only the HP supplement continued to be effective in minimizing BC loss (P less than .01). Calf birth weight tended (P = .17) to increase in a linear fashion to increasing supplemental protein concentration, but calf ADG and cow reproductive efficiency were unaffected (P greater than .10). In Exp. 2, forage OM intake responded in a quadratic fashion (P less than .10), with the MP treatment having the highest NDF digestibility and ruminal OM fill. In conclusion, beef cow BC and BW losses during the winter grazing period were minimized with increasing supplemental CP concentration. Intake and utilization of dormant forage by steers were improved with moderate (26%) levels of CP in the supplement.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Winterholler, D. L. Lalman, T. K. Dye, C. P. McMurphy, and C. J. Richards In situ ruminal degradation characteristics of by-product feedstuffs for beef cattle consuming low-quality forage J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 2996 - 3002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Winterholler, D. L. Lalman, M. D. Hudson, and C. L. Goad Supplemental energy and extruded-expelled cottonseed meal as a supplemental protein source for beef cows consuming low-quality forage J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3003 - 3012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Hersom Opportunities to enhance performance and efficiency through nutrient synchrony in forage-fed ruminants J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E306 - E317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Loy, J. C. MacDonald, T. J. Klopfenstein, and G. E. Erickson Effect of distillers grains or corn supplementation frequency on forage intake and digestibility J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2625 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Leupp, J. S. Caton, S. A. Soto-Navarro, and G. P. Lardy Effects of cooked molasses blocks and fermentation extract or brown seaweed meal inclusion on intake, digestion, and microbial efficiency in steers fed low-quality hay J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2938 - 2945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Reed, G. P. Lardy, M. L. Bauer, T. C. Gilbery, and J. S. Caton Effect of field pea level on intake, digestion, microbial efficiency, ruminal fermentation, and in situ disappearance in beef steers fed forage-based diets J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 2185 - 2192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. N. Bodine and H. T. Purvis II Effects of supplemental energy and/or degradable intake protein on performance, grazing behavior, intake, digestibility, and fecal and blood indices by beef steers grazed on dormant native tallgrass prairie J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 304 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |