J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pond, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mersmann, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pond, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Mersmann, H. J.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 68, Issue 2 352-362, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Differential compensatory growth in swine following control of feed intake by a high-alfalfa diet fed ad libitum or by limited feed

W. G. Pond and H. J. Mersmann
U.S. Department of Agriculture, NE, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Anim. Res. Center.

Seventy-two castrated male four-way composite (Chester White x Landrace x Large White x Yorkshire) weanling pigs (17 kg initial BW) were used to determine the compensatory response of specific organs and whole body following a 3-wk period of restricted energy intake imposed by ad libitum-feeding an 80% alfalfa meal diet or pair-feeding an adequate corn-soybean meal diet to attain equal weight loss. Six pigs were killed at d 0 to provide baseline data. Six pigs from each diet group (control, C; alfalfa, A, restricted, R) were killed at d 21, after which all remaining pigs were fed C ad libitum to 35 d, 105 d or 126 d. Six pigs per group were killed at 35 and 105 d and four per group were killed at 126 d. Organ weight and carcass data were recorded for all pigs at all time intervals. Regression of organ and trimmed lean tissue weights on time was tested for linearity (d 1 to 126 for C and d 21 to 126 for A and R except d 35 to 126 for gastrointestinal tract traits for A and R); differences in organ weights between C, A and R at d 21 and d 35 were tested by a two-way analysis of variance. There was no evidence of a compensatory growth response to dietary energy restriction for 21 d except for rate of change in weights of liver and kidneys and backfat depth from 21 to 126 d and of gastrointestinal tract components from 21 to 35 d. Specific organs may exhibit compensatory growth over different time spans in young pigs in the absence of observable weight compensation at the whole-animal level.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
P. A. Lovatto, D. Sauvant, J. Noblet, S. Dubois, and J. van Milgen
Effects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3329 - 3336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. S. Edmonds and D. H. Baker
Effect of dietary protein fluctuations and space allocation on performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing pigs
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2783 - 2791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. Y. Whang, S. W. Kim, S. M. Donovan, F. K. McKeith, and R. A. Easter
Effects of protein deprivation on subsequent growth performance, gain of body components, and protein requirements in growing pigs
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 705 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Animal Science.