J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rumsey, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rumsey, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Hammond, A. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 68, Issue 12 4310-4318, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of intake level on metabolic response to estrogenic growth promoters in beef steers

T. S. Rumsey and A. C. Hammond
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705.

Effects of diethylstilbestrol (DES, 10 mg/d orally, Trial 1) or Synovex-S (SYN, 220 mg ear implant, Trial 2) on gain and N balance (g/d) were determined in steers that consumed 1.3, 2.7, 4.4 and 7.4 kg DM/d (Trial 1) and 1.3, 2.9, 4.3 and 6.6 kg DM/d (Trial 2). Each trial was a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square with four pairs of steers per trial (BW:322 kg, Trial 1; 278 kg Trial 2) and a control and growth promoter steer in each pair. Steers were fed a pelleted 75% concentrate diet containing 16.7% (DM basis). Each period consisted of 1 wk of intake adaptation, 5 wk of feeding and 1 wk in metabolism crates (2-d adjustment and 5-d collection). Steers were switched among DMI but not among promoter treatments. Intercept and slope, respectively, for the regression of BW gain (kg/d) on DMI (kg/d) were -.66 and .276 for control vs -.84 and .328 for DES steers and -.69 and .276 for control vs -.89 and .356 for SYN steers. Similar regression values for N balance (g/d) on DMI (kg/d) were -10.3 and 6.91 for control vs -17.2 and 9.10 for DES steers and -4.5 and 4.67 for control vs -7.6 and 5.85 for SYN steers. Across trials, slopes differed from zero (P less than .01), and promoter slopes differed from controls for gain (P less than .01) and N balance (P less than .10). During an extra period at the end of each trial, all steers were fed the high intake level for 6 wk, followed by N balance determinations the last 3 d of a 7-d fast.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
G. E. Aiken, L. K. McClanahan, B. H. Kirch, and F. N. Schrick
Performance and Physiology of Steers Following Grazing of Toxic Tall Fescue as Influenced by Feeding Soybean Hulls on Pasture and Postgraze Steroid Implantation
Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2008; 24(5): 392 - 398.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. E. Aiken, M. L. Looper, S. F. Tabler, D. K. Brauer, J. R. Strickland, and F. N. Schrick
Influence of stocking rate and steroidal implants on growth rate of steers grazing toxic tall fescue and subsequent physiological responses
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2006; 84(6): 1626 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. S. Rumsey, T. H. Elsasser, and S. Kahl
Roasted Soybeans and an Estrogenic Growth Promoter Affect the Thyroid Status of Beef Steers
J. Nutr., February 1, 1997; 127(2): 352 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Animal Science.