J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huston, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Calhoun, M. C.

Journal of Animal Science, Vol 68, Issue 12 3980-3986, Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Animal Science

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Effects of supplemental feed with or without ionophores on lambs and Angora kid goats on rangeland

J. E. Huston, B. S. Engdahl and M. C. Calhoun
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, San Angelo 76901.

Effects of supplemental feed and of ionophore concentration in supplemental feed on gastrointestinal rate parameters, forage intake and weight gain were measured in individually supplemented grazing lambs and Angora kid goats. The 12 dietary treatments included negative control (NC; grazed forage only), positive control (PC; grazing plus 13.6 g supplement DM/kg.75), and PC plus monensin or lasalocid, each at 33, 66, 99, 132 or 165 mg/kg in the supplement. Gastrointestinal fill, retention time, turnover rate and fecal output were estimated by applying a single-compartment model to the fecal excretion of a single dose of ytterbium. Forage digestibility was estimated from forage and fecal concentrations of indigestible fiber. Supplemental feed increased digestibility of forage and total intake in sheep but had no effect on forage intake. In goats, supplemental feed did not increase digestibility of forage but decreased forage intake. Supplemental feed increased weight gain in both species. Increasing the monensin concentration in supplemental feed reduced supplement intake greatly in sheep and slightly in goats. Lasalocid did not affect intake of supplement by either sheep or goats. Overall, ionophores had minimal effects on the response criteria. Because feed intake and digestibility were not affected, any increase in gain or efficiency in lambs or kid goats on rangeland from consumption of ionophores must be a result of their therapeutic value or of improved physiological efficiency.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Animal Science.