J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:2197-2211.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dzakuma, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dzakuma, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, D. L.

Computer Modeling of Sheep Reproduction: I. An Algorithm for Quantifying Anestrous Cycles in Ewes1

J. M. Dzakuma2 and D. L. Harris2

Purdue University and U.S. Department of Agriculture, West Lafayette, IN 47907

Abstract

An algorithm that mathematically describes annual estrous activity in ewes is given. The function fitted as the ordinate is similar to a normal distribution function related to date as the abscissa. The data used were collected from literature on different breeds and from different locations of the world; all studies had been specifically conducted to study estrous activity in ewes in these locations. Parameters estimated in an iterative procedure from the algorithm were length of time during which estrous cycles occurred (SA), a measure of asymmetry (SD), day of mid-estrous (DE), highest incidence of estrus (MX) and lowest incidence of estrus (MN), day of lowest incidence of estrus (DN) and day of mid-anestrous season (DA). Incidence of estrus is defined as the proportion of ewes exhibiting an active estrus. These parameters were estimated for several breeds and locations. The data, as collected, were inadequately cross-classified to allow for unconfounded estimation. However, analyses of fitted parameters that describe the curves gave quantitative results about the influences of breed of sheep, location, latitude and altitude and indicated which parameters were associated with these factors. Breeds differed significantly for SA, DE, MX and DA. Locations differed for DE, MX and DA. Latitude was associated with differences in DE, DN and DA with altitude also associated with differences in DE and DA. There were no significant effects on SD even though breeds differed sizably in SD.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. 9996 of the Purdue Agric. Exp. Sta. Joint research contribution from the Dept. of Anim. Sci., Purdue Univ. and the Anim. Genet. Res. Unit, ARS, USDA.

2 Present address: Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Anim. Res. Center, ARS, USDA, Clay Center, NE 68933.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.