J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:1933-1945.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neal, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kittok, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neal, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kittok, R. J.

Index Selection for Components of Litter Size in Swine: Response to Five Generations of Selection1

S. M. Neal2, R. K. Johnson3 and R. J. Kittok3

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

Abstract

Selection for an index of ovulation rate (OR) and embryo (fetal) survival rate (ES) to 50 d of gestation (I = 10.6 x OR + 72.6 x ES) was practiced for five generations in a line that was a composite population of the Large White and Landrace breeds of swine. A control line sampled from the same population was selected randomly and mated. Ovulation rate and number of fetuses (FETS) were measured by laparotomy and ES was calculated as FETS/OR. The select line averaged 43 litters by 18 sires and the control line averaged 42 litters by 15 sires per generation. Each generation, all females available in the select line (average of 147) were mated and laparotomized, but only selected females were farrowed. One-half of the females underwent laparotomy in the control line. Inbreeding coefficients at generation five averaged 5.34% for the select line and 4.59% for the control line. Regressions of the difference between means of the lines on generation number were .57 ± .11 for OR, -.013 ± .0096 for ES, .20 ± .20 for FETS and 5.10 ± 1.76 for I. Realized heritability for I was .30 ± .09. Heritabilities estimated by regression of daughter on dam were .17 ± .07 for OR, .18 ± .09 for ES and .08 ± .10 for FETS, and the genetic correlation between OR and ES was estimated to be -.56 ± .24. The increase in number of pigs per litter at birth was .19 ± .14 per generation.


Footnotes

1 Published as paper No. 8719, Journal Series, Agric. Res. Div., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln. Appreciation is expressed to B. Van Pelt, W. R. Lamberson, S. Sasaki, Y. T. Huang, G. R. Eckardt, T. E. Long and G. A. Bussler for assistance in collection of data.

2 Agric. Tech. Inst., The Ohio State Univ., Wooster 44691.

3 Anim. Sci. Dept., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Rosendo, T. Druet, J. Gogue, and J. P. Bidanel
Direct responses to six generations of selection for ovulation rate or prenatal survival in Large White pigs
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H.-W. Yen, J. J. Ford, D. R. Zimmerman, and R. K. Johnson
Follicular development and maturation in gilts selected for an index of high ovulation rate and high prenatal survival
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2005; 83(1): 130 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. D. Gladney, G. R. Bertani, R. K. Johnson, and D. Pomp
Evaluation of gene expression in pigs selected for enhanced reproduction using differential display PCR and human microarrays: I. Ovarian follicles
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 17 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. W. Holl and O. W. Robison
Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2003; 81(3): 624 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.