J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:1907-1915.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Parrett, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faulkner, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Parrett, D. F.

Effect of Testosterone Propionate on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Heifers and Cows

D. B. Faulkner, F. K. McKeith, L. L. Berger, D. J. Kesler and D. F. Parrett

University of Illinois1, Urbana 61801

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of testosterone on growth and composition of cattle. In the first experiment, crossbred yearling heifers (n = 48) were assigned to four treatments: 1) control (no implant), 2) Synovex-H implants on d 1 and 84, 3) one testosterone propionate implant administered on d 1 and a second on d 84 and 4) two testosterone propionate implants administered on d 1. Heifers were fed a high-energy diet for the 157-d study. Implanting with the high-testosterone treatment improved (P < .05) daily gain and feed efficiency compared with the other treatments. Marbling score was reduced (P < .05) with the high-testosterone treatment. In Exp. 2, mature cows (n = 36) were assigned to one of three feeding periods (0, 42, or 84 d) with the cows fed 42 or 84 d subdivided into two groups (implanted with testosterone propionate or nonimplanted control). Cows were fed a high-energy diet and slaughtered at the end of each feeding period. Testosterone did not influence (P > .05) feedlot performance. Increased time on feed reduced (P < .01) daily gain (live weight basis) and feed efficiency but did not influence feed intake. Testosterone treatment had little influence on the fat and moisture contents of the carcass soft tissue or on the palatability characteristics of loin steaks. Time on feed increased lean muscle mass and carcass fat (P < .05). Sensory traits were improved at 42 d on feed (P < .05), but no further sensory improvement was observed at 84 d. In summary, testosterone propionate improved the performance of heifers but not of cows.


Footnotes

1 Dept. of Anim. Sci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. M. Stelzleni, D. D. Johnson, and T. A. Thrift
Effects of Days on Concentrate Feed and Postmortem Aging on Carcass and Palatability Characteristics of Selected Muscles from Cull Beef Cows
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2008; 24(4): 334 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. M. Stelzleni, L. E. Patten, D. D. Johnson, C. R. Calkins, and B. L. Gwartney
Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2631 - 2638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.