HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Martin, R. E. Articles by Crenshaw, T. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Martin, R. E. Articles by Crenshaw, T. D.

Effect of Postnatal Nutritional Status on Subsequent Growth and Reproductive Performance of Gilts¹

University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706

Abstract

Two trials involving 128 gilts were conducted to determine the effect of nutritional status during the first 28 d postnatally on subsequent growth and reproductive performance. Nutritional status was altered by adjusting litter size at birth to either 6 or 12 pigs and maintaining a lactation length of either 13 or 28 d. Pigs weaned at d 13 were fed on an ad libitum basis or at 50% of ad libitum through d 28. After d 28, all pigs were fed the same diets through the first parity. By market weight (d 154) pigs recovered differences in body weight imposed during the early postnatal period. Postnatal nutritional status did not alter age at puberty. Gilts weaned at d 28 from litter size 6 produced 2.4 more (P < .05) ova than gilts from litter size 12; however, when weaned at d 13, gilts from litter size 6 produced 2.3 fewer ova than gilts from litter size 12. Feed restriction for 15 d postweaning did not depress ovulation rate in gilts. Subsequent litter size was not affected by postnatal litter size, lactation length or feed restriction, even though growth rate and ovulation rate had been altered by treatments imposed during the first 28 d postnatally. Assuming no difference in fertilization, these data suggest that prenatal mortality was altered by the early postnatal treatments and was the limiting factor for litter size. Until factors that influence prenatal losses are characterized and controlled, the alteration of nutritional status by changes in postnatal litter size, lactation length or feeding level will not detrimentally affect subsequent litter size in gilts.

¹ Dept. of Meat and Anim. Sci. Research supported by the College of Agric. and Life Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Pork Producers Assoc., and the Wisconsin Rural Rehabilitation Corp.