J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:881-886.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Savell, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cross, H. R.

Removing Excess Subcutaneous and Internal Fat from Beef Carcasses before Chilling1

J. W. Savell2, R. H. Knapp2, M. F. Miller3, H. A. Recio4 and H. R. Cross2

Texas Agricultural Experiment Station and Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

Abstract

Steers (n = 52) and heifers (n = 51) were selected randomly from several days' slaughter at a major packing plant. One side of each carcass was trimmed of 1) s.c. fat in excess of .64 cm, 2) all trimmable kidney, pelvic and heart fat and 3) all cod or udder fat in the flank region. Hot fat trim was calculated as a percentage of hot carcass weight. A subsample of carcasses (n = 20) was fabricated into primal and subprimal cuts. Major subprimal yields, fat trim in excess of .64 cm (fat that should have been removed hot; used to adjust the data on percentage hot fat trim for the entire study), and fat trim from the fabrication process (s.c. fat and seam fat exposed during fabrication) were calculated for each of the 20 carcasses. Accounting for the additional s.c. fat removed during fabrication that needed to be removed hot, the percentage adjusted hot fat trim from carcasses of different yield grades and sex classes was as follows: yield grade 1.0 = 5.48% for steers and 6.82% for heifers, 1.5 = 6.75% for steers and 8.09% for heifers, 2.0 = 8.03% for steers and 9.37% for heifers, 2.5 = 9.30% for steers and 10.64% for heifers, 3.0 = 10.57% for steers and 11.91% for heifers, 3.5 = 11.85% for steers and 13.19% for heifers, 4.0 = 13.12% for steers and 14.46% for heifers, and 4.5 = 14.40% for steers and 15.74% for heifers.


Footnotes

1 Technical Article 23487 from the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta. This study was funded partially by the National Cattlemen's Foundation, Englewood, CO with support from the Colorado Beef Board, the Nebraska Beef Industry Development Board, the Oklahoma Beef Commission and the American Meat Institute, Washington, DC. Appreciation is extended to the Meat Standardization and Review Branch, USDA, Washington, DC for its assistance in this project.

2 Meats and Muscle Biol. Sect., Dept. of Anim. Sci.

3 Dept. of Anim. and Dairy Sci., Livest. and Poult. Bldg., Univ. of Georgia, Athens 30602.

4 U.S. Meat Export Federation, 600 South Cherry Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80222-1716.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.