J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:827-834.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froetschel, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hagler, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froetschel, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hagler, W. M., Jr.

Effects of a Salivary Stimulant, Slaframine, on Ruminal Fermentation, Bacterial Protein Synthesis and Digestion in Frequently Fed Steers1

M. A. Froetschel2, H. E. Amos2, J. J. Evans3, W. J. Croom, Jr.4 and W. M. Hagler, Jr.5

University of Georgia, Athens 30602, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens 30602 and North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695

Abstract

Slaframine (SF), a parasympathomimetic salivary stimulant, was administered i.m. (10, 15 or 20 µg SF/kg BW) to ruminally and abomasally fistulated steers at 12-h intervals for 18-d periods in a latin square-designed experiment. Steers were fed semicontinuously (12 times daily) a 40:60 roughagexoncentrate diet at twice their net energy requirement for maintenance. Ruminal digestion coefficients for DM, ADF and starch were 10 to 16% lower and linearly related in an inverse manner to the level of SF administered (P < .05). Postruminal digestion of DM, ADF and starch increased as much as 46.7, 9.5 and 44.0%, respectively, in a fashion linearly related (P < .05) to the level of SF administered. Total tract digestion of DM and ADF were not affected by SF; however, total tract starch digestion was increased as much as 5% and was related linearly (P < .05) to SF treatment. With SF administration, as much as 13% more bacterial protein exited the rumen, resulting in a 16.5% linear improvement (P < .1) in the efficiency of ruminal bacterial protein production per 100 g of OM fermented. Ruminal concentrations of VFA, ammonia and pH were not affected by SF. These results demonstrate a positive relationship between salivation and ruminal bacterial protein synthesis and suggest that feed utilization by ruminants may be improved by pharmacological stimulation of salivary secretions.


Footnotes

1 A portion of the funding for this project was provided by the Office of the Vice President for Research, New Faculty Grants Program, University of Georgia, Athens.

2 Dept. of Anim. and Dairy Sci., Univ. of Georgia, Athens.

3 Richard B. Russell Agric. Res. Center, Athens, GA.

4 Nutrition Program, Dept. of Anim. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.

5 Nutrition Program, Dept. of Poult. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.