J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:318-328.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Oltjen, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mader, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Oltjen, R. R.

Effects of Previous Nutrition, Feedlot Regimen and Protein Level on Feedlot Performance of Beef Cattle1

T. L. Mader2, O. A. Turgeon, Jr.3, T. J. Klopfenstein2, D. R. Brink2 and R. R. Oltjen4

University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908 and U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933

Abstract

In Exp. 1, feedlot performance was measured using 200 mixed-breed heifers (276 kg and 231 d of age) previously subjected to different production systems (cornstalks vs cornstalks-grass). During the feedlot feeding phase, two energy regimens (corn vs corn silage-corn) and two protein (CP) levels (10.9 vs 12.8%) were provided. Heifers wintered on cornstalks (System 2) or wintered on cornstalks and summered on grass (System 3) had greater intakes (P < .05) and tended (P = .14) to gain faster (1.00 vs 1.21 kg/d) in the feedlot than heifers placed in the feedlot soon after weaning (System 1). Heifers managed under System 3 had greater intakes (P < .05) than heifers managed under System 2, although feed conversions (.122 vs .123 gain/feed) were similar for the two heifer groups. Feedlot regimen by protein level interactions were observed in Systems 2 and 3. Improved daily gains (P = .10) and feed conversions (P = .06) were found in heifers fed the high-CP diets (12.8%) when managed under the corn diet regimens but not in heifers managed under the corn silage-corn regimens. In Exp. 2, steers with compensating gain that were fed 11.4 or 12.4% CP finishing diets had faster (P < .05) gains and were more efficient in feed utilization (P < .05) than steers previously fed corn silage diets. Gains and efficiencies of compensating steers fed a 10.4% CP finishing diet did not differ from control steers fed 11.4% CP diets. Results of these studies suggest that cattle placed on high-energy finishing diets immediately after an extended period of nutritional restriction will respond to levels of protein higher than recommended; however, under more gradual realimentation regimens, additional protein is not warranted.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director as Paper No. 8488.

2 Anim. Sci. Dept.

3 Koers Consulting Inc., Salina, KS 67401.

4 Director of Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Schoonmaker, M. J. Cecava, F. L. Fluharty, H. N. Zerby, and S. C. Loerch
Effect of source and amount of energy and rate of growth in the growing phase on performance and carcass characteristics of early- and normal-weaned steers
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 273 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Schoonmaker, M. J. Cecava, D. B. Faulkner, F. L. Fluharty, H. N. Zerby, and S. C. Loerch
Effect of source of energy and rate of growth on performance, carcass characteristics, ruminal fermentation, and serum glucose and insulin of early-weaned steers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2003; 81(4): 843 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.