HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Solís, J. C. Articles by Greene, L. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Solís, J. C. Articles by Greene, L. W.

Anabolic Implant and Frame Size Effects on Growth Regulation, Nutrient Repartitions and Energetic Efficiency of Feedlot Steers^1,2,

Texas A&M University and Texas Agricultural Experimental Station³, College Station 77843

Abstract

Rates of growth and partitioning of nutrients among tissues were measured in large (Simmental x [Hereford x Brahman]; n = 34) and very large (Chianina x Angus and Maine Anjou x Angus; n =37) steers implanted with different anabolic growth regulators. All cattle were fed individually a whole shelled corn (13% crude protein) diet. Implant strategies were: none (n = 13), Ralgro 36 mg (n = 15), Ralgro 72 mg (n = 14), Synovex-S (n = 15) and Ralgro 36-Synovex-S (n = 14) administered at d 0 and 90. Empty body composition of all cattle was measured initially and at 90 d by D₂O dilution procedures and at slaughter (average, 182 ± 4.1 d) by carcass specific gravity. Empty body weight for large and very large cattle averaged 274 and 324 kg (P < .05) initially and 497 and 603 kg (P < .05) at slaughter. Empty body protein differed (P < .05) for large and very large steers and averaged 51 and 61, 67 and 79, and 87 and 103 kg initially, at midpoint and at slaughter, respectively. Percentage empty body fat was lower for very large steers (13.5 vs 15.6%) initially (P < .05) but was similar for very large and large steers at the midpoint (18.7 vs 18.1%) and at slaughter (23.2 vs 21.9%). Daily rates of empty body gain (DEBG) were greater (P < .05) for very large vs large steers for both growing and finishing periods and averaged 1.53 vs 1.26 kg/d overall. Daily rates of protein gain (DPG) were similar for very large and large steers for the growing phase (204 vs 202 g/d) but greater (P < .05) in very large steers for the finishing phase and overall (253 vs 204, and 229 vs 202 g/d). All implant strategies, except R36, increased DEBG and DPG and tended to decrease the percentage of fat in daily gain. In both large and very large cattle, implant growth regulators increased growth rate and partitioned nutrient use away from fat toward protein accretion, with the magnitude of partitioning toward protein increasing with greater rates of growth. These data indicate that anabolic growth regulators are viable strategies to enhance lean beef production in steers, regardless of animal size.

¹ Journal paper TA 23636, Beef Cattle Nutr. and Growth Sect., Dept. of Anm. Sci., Texas A&M Univ. and Texas Agric. Exp. Sta.

² Reference to a company or a trade name does not imply approval or endorsement by the Texas Agric. Exp. Sta.

³ Dept. of Anim. Sci.