J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:2646-2654.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Calkins, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Calkins, C. R.

Muscle Protein Turnover and Tenderness in Broiler Chickens Fed Cimaterol1,2,3,

J. B. Morgan, S. J. Jones and C. R. Calkins

University of Nebraska4, Lincoln 68583-0908

Abstract

To investigate the impact of cimaterol (CIM) on muscle protein turnover, carcass and muscle composition, muscle cathepsin B+L activity and meat tenderness, 21-d-old broiler chickens (n = 88) were assigned to dietary treatments of either 0 or 1 ppm CIM. Fractional synthesis rates (FSR), fractional accretion rates (FAR), proximate composition and collagen content were determined in the breast muscle (BM; pectoralis major) and a group of leg muscles (LM; gastrocnemius and peroneous longus) from groups of six birds per treatment within each of two time periods (age = 38 or 56 d). Whole body composition, serum hydroxyproline content and BM cathepsin B+L activity also were measured. Fractional degradation rates (FDR) were calculated as the difference between FSR and FAR. Feeding CIM increased (P < .01) whole body protein content. Weights of LM and percentage of body weight as BM and LM were increased (P < .05) when CIM was included in the diet. Although FSR was not significantly reduced by CIM feeding, it decreased (P < .05) with increasing age. Due to decreases in FAR, FDR thereby was reduced by CIM 31.5% and 11.9% in BM and 38.2% and 37.4% in LM at 38 d and 56 d of age, respectively. Cathepsin B+L activities also were reduced 33.6% (P < .01) and shear forces were increased by 41% (P < .05) by CIM feeding. For chickens fed CIM, the correlation between cathepsin B+L activity and shear force was -.63 (P < .01). Feeding CIM improved carcass leanness and muscling due to reductions in FDR and proteolytic enzyme activity. Feeding CIM also reduced meat tenderness.


Footnotes

1 Paper number 8771, Journal Series, Nebraska Agric. Res. Div., Inst, of Agric. and Nat. Resources.

2 Cimaterol provided as a gift from American Cyanamid, Princeton, NJ.

3 This research was supported by the Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln Res. Council and NIH Biomed. Res. Support Grant RR-07055.

4 Dept. of Anim. Sci.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.