J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1989. 67:28-39.
© 1989 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tess, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tess, M. W.

Evaluation of Crossbreeding Systems for Small Beef Herds: I. Single-Sire Systems1

M. A. Lamb2 and M. W. Tess2,3,

North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7621

Abstract

Stochastic computer models were developed to evaluate crossbreeding systems in small beef herds consisting of one bull, 30 cows and 10 replacements. Six systems were simulated: purebred (PB), two- and three-breed rotations using one bull per year (2R and 3R) or artificial insemination (2RAI and 3RAI) and four-breed composite (COMP). Inbreeding was avoided in all systems. Female replacements were selected from within the herd, whereas sires were purchased. Average heterosis estimates were assumed for calf survival (4.0%), conception rate (6.6%), weaning weight (5.4%, individual; 4.7%, maternal) and mature weight (2.5%). Estimates of calf and dam heterosis were used to calculate performance for calf weights weaned and sold, cull cow weights sold, total weight sold and gross calf, cow and total income. All crossbred systems were superior to the purebred system for weights sold and total income. The 2R and 3R systems utilized 82 to 85% of maximum heterosis available in 2RAI and 3RAI systems, respectively; however, no significant losses were found in weights sold or gross incomes. The COMP system ranked higher than 2R and 2RAI systems for all traits. Increasing the number of breeds (2 vs 3) did not significantly increase total weights or gross incomes. Results demonstrated that practical crossbreeding can be managed easily in small herds and that matings resulting in suboptimal heterosis levels do not cause significant losses in gross income.

Footnotes

1 Paper no. 11521 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina ARS, Raleigh 27695-7601.

2 Dept. of Anim. Sci.

3 Current address: Dept. of Anim. and Range Sci., Montana State Univ., Bozeman 59717.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society of Animal Science.